Skip to main content

Questions tagged [realizability]

Realizability is a collection of methods in proof theory used to study constructive proofs and extract additional information from them.

9 votes
0 answers
252 views

There are theorems characterizing Kleene's realizability$\def\realize{\mathbin{\textbf{r}}}$ in various systems. For example, $$\textsf{HA} \vdash \exists n,n \realize \varphi \iff \exists n. \textsf{...
Trebor's user avatar
  • 2,166
3 votes
0 answers
136 views

The Kleene-Vesley topos $RT(\mathcal{K}_2,\mathcal{K}_2^{rec})$ and Effective topos $RT(\mathcal{K_1})$ share quite a few properties. They're evidently both constructive and reject LPO, and both have ...
Jason Carr's user avatar
5 votes
3 answers
394 views

Let: $\mathcal{K}_1$ be the first Kleene algebra, meaning $\mathbb{N}$ endowed with the partial operation $(p,n) \mapsto p\bullet n := \varphi_p(n)$ where $\varphi$ is the $p$-th partial computable ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38.6k
2 votes
0 answers
176 views

What do "Realizability of the axiom of choice in HOL" and "Realizability and the Axiom of Choice" mean when they claim they realize a non extensional version of $\sf AC$? Can they ...
Ember Edison's user avatar
  • 1,445
12 votes
0 answers
331 views

This is my first question on MathOverflow, so it is possible it is poorly composed. My interests lie in the field of the type theory and (higher) category theory, specifically I am interested in the ...
Nicolas's user avatar
  • 121
7 votes
1 answer
292 views

This question was prompted by this recent answer by aws on a question by Gro-Tsen. As that answer recalls, two PCA’s (partial combinatory algebras) are equivalent via applicative morphisms precisely ...
Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
502 views

Definition: “The” first Kleene algebra $\mathcal{K}_1$ is the set $\mathbb{N}$ of natural numbers endowed with the partial operation $(p,n) \mapsto p\bullet n := \varphi_p(n)$ where $\varphi_p$ is the ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38.6k
7 votes
1 answer
337 views

I am looking for a topos that describes realizability by Turing machines with access to a “variable oracle”. I think the construction I want is this. Start with Baire space $\mathcal{N} := \mathbb{N}^...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38.6k
3 votes
0 answers
176 views

Background According to A program for the full axiom of choice, forcing has a computational interpretation and a realizability models. However, this paper also mentions that it is not possible to ...
Ember Edison's user avatar
  • 1,445
3 votes
1 answer
129 views

Given a partial combinatory algebra $A$, the realizability topos $\mathrm{RT}(A)$ is the ex/lex completion of the category of partitioned assemblies $\mathrm{PA}(A)$. This implies that $\mathrm{PA}(A)$...
Colin's user avatar
  • 171
4 votes
0 answers
311 views

On page 230 of An abstract notion of realizability ..., Läuchli writes the following: If we drop the restrictions put on $\Theta$, then we get classical logic in one case and an intermediate thing in ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
248 views

I just read Dunn's 1979 paper Relevant Robinson's Arithmetic, and the end especially caught my interest. Following the surprising role of constant functions in collapsing "relevant Q with zero&...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
15 votes
2 answers
909 views

Koepke's paper Turing Computations on Ordinals defines a notion of "ordinal computability" using Turing machines with a tape the length of Ord and that can run for Ord-many steps, and shows ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 68.7k
3 votes
0 answers
130 views

Proofs that various real numbers are not rational or not algebraic tend to be constructively valid as is. Examples include the proofs that $\sqrt 2$ and $\log_2(3)$ are not rational and that $e$ is ...
Christopher King's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
217 views

Short version: Various things are known about realizability of propositional formulas for Kleene's “first algebra” (i.e., $\mathbb{N}$), like examples of realizable but unprovable formulas, and some ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38.6k
4 votes
1 answer
333 views

$\let\T\mathrm\def\kr{\mathrel{\mathbf r}}$This is a follow up to Kleene realizability in Peano arithmetic. We can summarize the results from Emil Jeřábek's answer as follows: \begin{gather*} T_1 = \{ ...
Christopher King's user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
220 views

Setup: Let $\alpha$ be an admissible ordinal (viꝫ., one such that $L_\alpha$ is a model of Kripke-Platek set theory), identified as usual with the set of ordinals $<\alpha$. Then there is a ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38.6k
7 votes
0 answers
360 views

See Kleene realizability in Peano arithmetic for a similar question, but about PA instead of ZFC. (In particular, an answer as specific as Emil Jeřábek's answer would be great!) In the context of ...
Christopher King's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
359 views

(This is really long because I give a lot of context, but you can skip right to the end where the excerpt I'm trying to make sense of is copied and translated.) Background: I'm trying to understand ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38.6k
14 votes
1 answer
788 views

Consider, on the one hand: the Curry-Howard correspondence between, on the one hand, types and terms (programs) in various flavors of typed $\lambda$-calculus, and on the other, propositions and ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38.6k
3 votes
0 answers
133 views

Below, by "structure" I mean "computable structure in a finite language with domain $\omega$," and by "sentence" I mean "finitary first-order sentence containing no ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
149 views

Below, "structure" means "computable structure in a computable language." In particular, we do distinguish between isomorphic copies of the same structure. Let $\mathcal{L}_{\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
348 views

It is a well-known fact that given a first-order sentence $\psi$ in prenex normal form $\forall x_1 \exists y_1 \forall x_2 \exists y_2 \dots \forall x_n \exists y_n \theta(x_1,\dots,x_n,y_1,\dots,y_n)...
James E Hanson's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
524 views

After a long story of dancing around the effective topos $ \mathcal{Eff}$, I finally resolved to get to the bottom of it. To this effect, working as it were backward, I ended up revisiting Kleene's ...
Mirco A. Mannucci's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
617 views

$ \def \CZF {\mathbf {CZF}} \def \IZF {\mathbf {IZF}} \def \A {\mathcal A} \def \then {\mathrel \rightarrow} \def \r {\mathrel \Vdash} \DeclareMathOperator \V V $ In "Realizability for ...
Mohsen Shahriari's user avatar
11 votes
0 answers
169 views

An internal category $\mathbb A$ in an elementary topos $\mathcal E$ is called an (intrinsic) stack if the indexed category that it represents, $(X\in \mathcal E) \mapsto \mathcal{E}(X,\mathbb A) \in \...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 68.7k
7 votes
1 answer
297 views

Let $\Delta$ be a simplicial sphere, that is, a finite (abstract) simplicial complex whose canonical geometric realization $|\Delta|$ is homeomorphic to a sphere $\mathbf S^d\subset\Bbb R^{d+1}$. ...
M. Winter's user avatar
  • 14.5k
5 votes
1 answer
345 views

More percisely: Question: Is there a (convex) polytope that has a unique realization up to, say, projective transformations? I suppose I have to assume that it has more than $d+2$ vertices/facets if ...
M. Winter's user avatar
  • 14.5k
19 votes
1 answer
1k views

It is known that not every convex polytope (even polyhedron, e.g. this one) can be made inscribed, that is, we cannot always move its vertices so that all vertices end up on a common sphere, and the ...
M. Winter's user avatar
  • 14.5k
14 votes
2 answers
670 views

This may be a very naive question which only reflects my failure at literature search, but: Although realizability (in its original form at least) is grounded in computability, the details of ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
848 views

For completeness of MathOverflow and for clarity of the question, I will first recall a few things, including the the definition of Kleene realizability: experts can jump directly to the question ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38.6k
6 votes
1 answer
309 views

In Realizability: A Historical Essay [Jaap van Oosten, 2002], it is said that recursive realizability and HA provability do not concur, because although every HA provable closed formula is realizable, ...
Kelley van Evert's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
426 views

Harvey Friedman's request on the FoM-forum for an overview of current intuitionistic foundations revived the following question, which I have been meaning to ask for five years. (I'm no expert on ...
Franka Waaldijk's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
388 views

The effective topos is a well known universe of sets suitable for abstract computability, as it is build "from the ground up" via the classical notion of realisability by Kleene. I have found a few ...
Mirco A. Mannucci's user avatar
17 votes
2 answers
2k views

In this post about the difference between the recursive and effective topos, Andrej Bauer said: If you are looking for a deeper explanation, then perhaps it is fair to say that the Recursive Topos ...
Neel Krishnaswami's user avatar