Skip to main content

Questions tagged [constructive-mathematics]

Constructive mathematics in the style of Bishop, including its semantics using realizabilty or topological methods.

9 votes
2 answers
469 views

Does every reduced ring inject into a von Neumann regular one, constructively?

Classically, every commutative $R$ without nilpotents embeds into the product of its residue fields. Of course, the proof uses Zorn’s lemma in an essential way. Since a product of fields is von ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
  • 66.5k
1 vote
1 answer
56 views

How to prove this construction of maximum distance 2-point logarithm for directed acyclic graph

Problem: Find the simple directed acyclic graph with $n$ vertices that maximizes the number of vertex pairs with distance 2. The ordered pair $(x,y)$ is defined to have distance 2 if there exists an ...
riceup's user avatar
  • 11
9 votes
0 answers
250 views

Characterization theorems for lambda calculus realizability

There are theorems characterizing Kleene's realizability$\def\realize{\mathbin{\textbf{r}}}$ in various systems. For example, $$\textsf{HA} \vdash \exists n,n \realize \varphi \iff \exists n. \textsf{...
Trebor's user avatar
  • 2,166
2 votes
0 answers
130 views

Logical differences between Effective and Kleene-Vesley topos

The Kleene-Vesley topos $RT(\mathcal{K}_2,\mathcal{K}_2^{rec})$ and Effective topos $RT(\mathcal{K_1})$ share quite a few properties. They're evidently both constructive and reject LPO, and both have ...
Jason Carr's user avatar
8 votes
3 answers
752 views

Arithmetic of constructive Dedekind reals

The construction of Cauchy real numbers in Constructive mathematics is well known. We can define addition, subtraction, multiplication, and order as usual and prove that they form an ordered field. ...
Mohammad Tahmasbizade's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
171 views

What is known about realizability model of the real analysis?

What do "Realizability of the axiom of choice in HOL" and "Realizability and the Axiom of Choice" mean when they claim they realize a non extensional version of $\sf AC$? Can they ...
Ember Edison's user avatar
  • 1,425
3 votes
0 answers
117 views

Is there a universal LCCB (locally compact, countably based) sober space?

By LC, I mean that every neighbourhood (of a point, or compact subspace) contains a compact neighbourhood. Every locally-closed (open $\cap$ closed) subspace of a LC space is LC. Similarly for locally-...
Robin Saunders's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
124 views

On the history of the “bb” propositional formula that characterizes finite Kripke frames of bounded branching

The intuitionistic propositional formula $\mathbf{bb}_n$ (in the $n+1$ variables $p_0,\ldots,p_n$) is: $$ \bigwedge_{i=0}^n \Big ( \big (p_i \Rightarrow \bigvee_{j\neq i} p_j\big) \,\Rightarrow \, \...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38k
33 votes
4 answers
4k views

Why is it so difficult to define constructive cardinality?

Consider Frege's cardinality and HoTT set-truncation cardinality, both of which can be well-defined in constructive theory (as SetoidTT and CubicalTT, respectively). Why don’t we regard them as well ...
Ember Edison's user avatar
  • 1,425
6 votes
1 answer
272 views

$\mathit{RCA}_0$ without the law of the excluded middle

$\newcommand\name{\mathit}$In Classical Reverse Mathematics, the most famous base theory is $\name{RCA}_0$. I want to work in the area of formal Constructive Reverse Mathematics. I wonder if "$\...
Mohammad Tahmasbizade's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
641 views

Is there a more abstract or unified way to write the modulus condition in constructive definitions of real numbers?

I'm a beginner in constructive mathematics, and while studying different definitions of real numbers, I came across three sources that seem to describe equivalent notions of Cauchy reals: The first ...
Dzming Li's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
219 views

Different forms of completeness of intuitionistic propositional logic for topological semantics

I've gotten myself very confused as to what “completeness” means in the context of intuitionistic logic. I'm aware of the following theorem (Alfred Tarski, “Der Aussagenkalkül und die Topologie”, Fund....
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38k
39 votes
4 answers
4k views

Is every real number the limit of a sequence of irrational numbers, constructively?

By $\mathbb{R}$ I mean Dedekind real numbers. By $X \setminus Y$ I mean $\{x \in X: \neg(x \in Y)\}$. Let $x \in \mathbb{R}$. Can we construct (without using the law of the excluded middle and the ...
Mohammad Tahmasbizade's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
330 views

Does analytic WLLPO together with sequential LLPO imply analytic LLPO?

This question is about constructive mathematics, without any form of Choice except Unique Choice, such as in the internal logic of a topos with natural numbers object, or in IZF. The “reals” (and the ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38k
9 votes
0 answers
336 views

Does the decomposability of $\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}$ imply the decomposability of $\mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}$?

By $\mathbb{R}$ I mean Dedekind real numbers. By $X \setminus Y$ I mean $\{x \in X: \neg (x \in Y)\}$. Let's assume the following statements: ($\bf WLLPO$) For all binary sequence $(\alpha_n)$ with at ...
Mohammad Tahmasbizade's user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
2k views

Why are quotients so much trickier in constructive type theory than in constructive set theory?

Quotients in constructive type theory are a bit of a pain. My understanding is that the first type theory that supported them well was cubical type theory, and in previous type theories the ...
Christopher King's user avatar
10 votes
2 answers
744 views

What's the deal with predicative foundations?

The working mathematician and layperson's reasons for caring about constructive foundations are well-documented. Topos theory, in particular, gives an abundance of examples in nature of settings where ...
Garrett Figueroa's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
335 views

Diaconescu's theorem in type theory without propositional extensionality

Diaconescu's theorem states that the axiom of choice implies excluded middle. It can be proven, e.g., in the internal logic of a topos, or in IZF. The usual proof is the following: Proof: Assume AC ...
Jean Abou Samra's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
225 views

What (if any) fragment of MLTT has the same proof theoretic strength as CZF + wREA

It seems to be fairly well known that MLTT (with W-types) and one universe has the same proof theoretic strength as CZF with the regular extension axiom (see section 5 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610....
ToucanIan's user avatar
  • 453
3 votes
0 answers
176 views

Realizability model of the core models/inner models

Background According to A program for the full axiom of choice, forcing has a computational interpretation and a realizability models. However, this paper also mentions that it is not possible to ...
Ember Edison's user avatar
  • 1,425
11 votes
1 answer
637 views

Does subsingleton choice imply LEM?

We know from Diaconescu's theorem that the axiom of choice over pairs implies the law of excluded middle. What about the axiom of choice over subsingletons. Recall that $S$ is a subsingleton if the ...
Christopher King's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
168 views

When does the disjunction property imply Church's rule?

A theory $T$ has the disjunction property when $(T \vdash \phi \lor \psi) \implies ((T \vdash \phi) \lor (T \vdash \psi))$. A theory $T$ has Church's rule when $T \vdash \forall x \in \mathbb N. \...
Christopher King's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
307 views

Does the axiom of countable choice constructively imply an omniscience principle?

$\newcommand\name{\mathrm}\newcommand\BISH{\name{BISH}}\newcommand\ACC{\name{ACC}}\newcommand\LPO{\name{LPO}}\newcommand\WLPO{\name{WLPO}}\newcommand\LLPO{\name{LLPO}}\newcommand\WLLPO{\name{WLLPO}}\...
Mohammad Tahmasbizade's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
342 views

Mathematical strength of the statement "Heyting Arithmetic admits Markov's rule"

Consider the following theorem about Heyting arithmetic (HA): For every arithmetical formula $\phi$ whose only free variable is $n$, if $\text{HA} \vdash \forall n. \phi \lor \lnot \phi$ and $\text{...
Christopher King's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
248 views

Construction of the smallest nucleus above a prenucleus: what does this proof tell us?

While reading Hyland's paper on the effective topos [retyped version here] in the L. E. J. Brouwer Centenary Symposium, specifically prop. 16.3, I realized that the following proposition is implicit: ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38k
6 votes
1 answer
300 views

Does this weak omniscience principle have a name?

In constructive analysis, I'm looking at principles which follow both when there exists at least one discontinuous function from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}$ (equivalent to WLPO i.e. $x > 0$ or $x \...
saolof's user avatar
  • 2,019
6 votes
2 answers
678 views

Can the real numbers be constructed as/from a Hom-object in a topos?

I've been reading through Greenblatt's Topoi and while I'm still definitely over my head I'm starting to get a feel for some of the concepts at play there. I see the definitions of $\mathbb{R}_c$ and $...
Steven Stadnicki's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
316 views

Examples of anti-classical theories in iFOL

An anti-classical axiom $\phi$ is one which is inconsistent with LEM Are there any sources for good examples of anti-classical theories in intuitionstic first-order logic? There are many examples of ...
Jason Carr's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
372 views

Does a special property hold if the Archimedean property for reals doesn't hold?

Suppose $\mathbb{R}^e=A \cup B$ in which $A \cap B=\varnothing$ and there exist real numbers $a_0$ and $b_0$ such that $a_0 \in A$ and $b_0 \in B$. My question is, can we construct $a \in A$ and $b \...
Mohammad Tahmasbizade's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
344 views

What did Mirimanoff say about Intuitionism?

Dmitry Mirimanoff, "L'intuitionisme", Alma Mater n° 6, Geneva, 1945. Most of Mirimanoff's work was in number theory, but he wrote three papers about set theory that were way ahead of their ...
Paul Taylor's user avatar
  • 9,218
6 votes
2 answers
478 views

Weak Archimedean property instead of Archimedean property

We say that a sequence $(z_n)$ of real numbers is a modulated Cauchy sequence, whenever there exists a function $\alpha:\mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ such that: $$ |z_i-z_j| \le \frac{1}{k} \quad ...
Mohammad Tahmasbizade's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
446 views

Does the decomposability of $\mathbb{R}$ imply analytic LLPO?

By "BISH" I mean constructive mathematics without axiom of countable choice. By $\mathbb{R}^f$ I mean real numbers as fundamental sequences of rational numbers and by $\mathbb{R}^d$ I mean ...
Mohammad Tahmasbizade's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
311 views

Läuchli's "intermediate thing"

On page 230 of An abstract notion of realizability ..., Läuchli writes the following: If we drop the restrictions put on $\Theta$, then we get classical logic in one case and an intermediate thing in ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
1k views

Consistency strength of HoTT

What is the consistency strength of Homotopy type theory (HoTT) relative to various set theories (e.g., are there any known set theories that it can interpret)? Does this question even make sense?
Jesse Elliott's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
206 views

How to define Dedekind reals and Eudoxus reals such that they are equivalent to unmodulated Cauchy reals

In constructive mathematics without choice, we have three different versions of the real numbers (each embedding into the next). Regular Cauchy reals (functions $f : \mathbb N \to \mathbb Q$ such ...
Christopher King's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
649 views

Decimal expansion definition of real numbers, constructively

The two most common definitions of $\mathbb{R}$ are as Dedekind cuts or Cauchy sequences of rational numbers. A real analysis student of mine is working out of the book Real Analysis and Applications ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.4k
6 votes
0 answers
192 views

Constructive mathematics with different computational models

I am interested in understanding how the capabilities of constructive mathematics evolve when different computational models are considered. Specifically, if constructive mathematics traditionally ...
Pan Mrož's user avatar
  • 489
10 votes
2 answers
488 views

How big can function spaces get without extensionality?

In what follows we work in the usual formulation of Martin-Löf Type Theory including Axiom K [1]. Boldface numbers $\mathbf{n}$ denote the usual finite type with $n$ elements. Motivation Postulating ...
Z. A. K.'s user avatar
  • 783
8 votes
1 answer
384 views

Equivalence of omniscience principles for natural numbers and analytic omniscience principles for Cauchy real numbers

In constructive mathematics, a proposition $P$ is decidable if $P \vee \neg P$, and a proposition is stable if $\neg \neg P \implies P$. We have the following principles of omniscience for the natural ...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
181 views

Constructively, when do functions that agree on $[a, b] \cup [b, c]$ also agree on $[a,c]$?

Let $a, b, c \in \mathbb R$ such that $a \le b \le c$. Let $S$ be some set and $f, g : [a, c] \to S$ be functions. As a follow up to When can a function defined on $[a, b] \cup [b, c]$ be ...
Christopher King's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
247 views

Is the Tarski–Seidenberg theorem constructively provable?

The Tarski–Seidenberg theorem asserts that the projection of a semialgebraic set is also a semialgebraic set. My question is whether this is provable in constructive mathematics. First, let me ...
Christopher King's user avatar
11 votes
0 answers
226 views

Closed sets versus closed sublocales in general topology in constructive math

This question is set in constructive mathematics (without Choice), such as in the internal logic of a topos with natural numbers object, or in IZF. Short version of the question: if $X$ is a sober ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38k
8 votes
2 answers
682 views

Condition to guarantee that an inhabited and bounded set of reals has a supremum

This question is about constructive mathematics (without Choice), such as in the internal logic of a topos with natural numbers object, or in IZF. The “reals” (and the symbol $\mathbb{R}$) refer to ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 38k
15 votes
3 answers
2k views

Exponentials of truth values

I noticed that the exponentiation identity $$\exp(r + s) = \exp(r) \cdot \exp(s)~,$$ which is of course completely standard for real or complex numbers also holds in a Boolean setting. That is, when I ...
blk's user avatar
  • 341
8 votes
0 answers
535 views

Can the p-adic be countable?

Recently arxiv submitted a new paper (Andrej Bauer, James E. Hanson, The Countable Reals) claiming an incredible theorem that Dedekind reals are not sequence-avoiding, and furthermore obtaining a ...
Ember Edison's user avatar
  • 1,425
9 votes
1 answer
330 views

Does there exist a geometric morphism between the effective and topological topoi? Does one arise from synthetic topology?

I'm presenting in final projects for my computability and computational topology courses on the connections between computability, continuity, and logic. As a mathematician/unmentored baby logician ...
Garrett Figueroa's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
405 views

The constructive Eudoxus reals

Recently arxiv submitted a new paper (Andrej Bauer, James E. Hanson, The Countable Reals) claiming an incredible theorem that Dedekind reals are not sequence-avoiding, and furthermore obtaining a ...
Ember Edison's user avatar
  • 1,425
7 votes
0 answers
335 views

Is it decidable whether a statement about reals (in the language of ordered rings) is constructively provable?

The language of ordered rings is a first-order language with operators for $+$, $-$, and $\cdot$, constants for $0$ and $1$, and relations for $<$, $=$ and $>$. To decide whether such a ...
Christopher King's user avatar
18 votes
3 answers
3k views

What's the earliest result (outside of logic) that cannot be proven constructively?

Although mathematicians usually do not work in constructive mathematics per se, their results often are constructively valid (even if the original proof isn't). An obvious counter-example is the law ...
Christopher King's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
303 views

Are there Dedekind-infinite amorphous sets?

An amorphous set is an infinite set (i.e. cannot be put into bijection with any finite set $\{ 1, \dots, n \}$ for any $n$) that cannot be partitioned into two mutually disjoint infinite subsets. ...
Ahraman's user avatar
  • 151

1
2 3 4 5
7