0
$\begingroup$

Here is the problem:

Given a formula $f:\mathbb{R}^{n+k}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^n$, written as $f(x_1(t),x_2(t),...,x_n(t);a1,...ak)$ with $k$ real unknown parameters $a_1,...,a_k$. For any $(a1,...ak)$, $f$ is analytic on $\mathbb{R^n}$. $(x_1(t),x_2(t),...,x_n(t))$ is an unknown curve passing through $(0,0,...,0)$.$t\in\mathbb{R}$ is "time".

A constraint for $f$ is:

The formula $f(x_1(t),x_2(t),...,x_n(t);a1,...ak)$ should be constantly $(0,0,...,0)$ along the curve $(x_1(t),x_2(t),...,x_n(t))$.

I want to know about the curve $(x_1(t),x_2(t),...,x_n(t))$. For example,when do they exist,when are they unique,or can I derive the exact curve, and many other aspects.

Here are what I am intend to do to solve the problem:

Since $f$ is constantly $(0,0,...,0)$,I calculate the $n$th derivation of $f$:

The first derivation is:

$A\cdot X'$ where $A$ is the Jacobian of $f$ and $X'$ is the column vector $(\frac{dx_1}{dt},...,\frac{dx_n}{dt})^T$.Thus,and $X'$ can be solved by the linear equation $A\cdot X'=0$.

I can get the other $n$th derivation by the law of derivation of Matrix: (Given Matrix $S$ and $T$,$(S\cdot T)'=S'\cdot T=S\cdot T'$.)

So then the 2nd derivation is: $A'\cdot X+A\cdot X'$,notice that $A'$ is not an exact constant matrix but contains $X'$ term.While $X'$ can derived by the linear equation $A\cdot X'=0$.

Keep doing this,a block-matrix can be derived:

$\begin{bmatrix} b_{11} A&0 &0 & 0 &...&0 \\ b_{21}A'&b_{22} A &0 &0&... &0 \\ b_{31}A''&b_{32} A' &b_{33}A &0&... &0 \\ b_{41}A^{(3)}&b_{42}A'' &b_{43}A' &b_{44}A&... &0 \\ ...\\ b_{n1}A^{(n)}&b_{n2}A^{(n-1)}&&&...&0 \end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix} X' \\ X''\\ X^{(3)}\\ ...\\ X^{(n)} \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 0\\ 0\\ ...\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}$

$b_{i,j}$ are constants. Usually,Given any specific $f$,Each $X^{(i)}$ can be derived by the $i$th equation. But is there any thing can I derive when $f$ is not specific but with parameters?Such as the existence or the uniqueness of the curve $(x_1(t),x_2(t),...,x_n(t))$

Thanks ahead!

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Strictly speaking, $f$ should be defined on $\mathbb R ^{n+k}$. It is not clear if $C^\omega$ means "real analytic" or just $C^\infty$. It is not clear what "the formula $f(\dots)$ is $0$ for any $x(\dots)$" means. In general, though, this looks like an application of the implicit function theorem, and is therefore more appropriate for Mathematics. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 3, 2021 at 9:30
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexM. Thanks for the correcting!This problem is sure related to the "high order multi-variable implicit function theorem" but I thought the theorem (with correspondingly, the "chain rule")seems to be not able to solve the problem directly.According to the link,the same question has been post to math.stackexchange.com/questions/4241441/… Thanks again! $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2021 at 5:38

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.