Skip to content

Conversation

@randy3k
Copy link
Contributor

@randy3k randy3k commented Sep 18, 2017

history is already "gettable".

`history` is already iteratable.
@randy3k randy3k changed the title don't need to access member string 2.0 don't need to access member string Sep 18, 2017
@jonathanslenders jonathanslenders force-pushed the 2.0 branch 3 times, most recently from bb017a8 to fc0d3b2 Compare December 9, 2017 15:53
@randy3k
Copy link
Contributor Author

randy3k commented Jan 22, 2018

@jonathanslenders
Copy link
Member

This makes sense, but I'm not 100% sure yet. Possibly I'll have to redesign the API for the history. Some people asked for asynchronous loading of the history. I'm not yet sure how to make this work.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Contributor

It's also used in DynamicHistory.

@jonathanslenders
Copy link
Member

Closing this. The history has been refactored now. Feel free to open a new pull request if you think something is missing.

@randy3k randy3k deleted the history branch May 15, 2018 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants