Skip to content

Conversation

@cfournel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Owner

@cujomalainey cujomalainey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall it looks pretty good from an initial look. I just did an initial pass, I will try and take a look at it with the spec in hand tonight to verify the byte patterns. Are you familiar enough with git to squash to remove that number or do you want me to do it after submission?

Copy link
Owner

@cujomalainey cujomalainey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor issues but overall looks really good, I will hunt down why CI doesn't think it needs to run. Also you can check out Lev or Bicycle Power for examples on how to use common datapages. Thanks again for the contribution

@cfournel
Copy link
Contributor Author

cfournel commented Jan 14, 2022 via email

@cfournel
Copy link
Contributor Author

cfournel commented Jan 14, 2022 via email

@cujomalainey
Copy link
Owner

Hi Charles,

If you don't know how to squash then i should probably do it since it is a destructive action to git history so it can be dangerous if done incorrectly and cause you to lose work.

As for the philosophy I usually avoid those helpers as everyone may have a different preference for scale, but the benefit is you can write your own class in your app and extend it yourself and use it in place of the original message for both TX and RX. For TX you just use your type, for RX you just load the data pointer from the original message similar to how its done in the display from the original message then you can use the extensions.

@cujomalainey
Copy link
Owner

Hello Charles

Do you have time to address these comments or should I merge and squash them and address them later?

@cujomalainey
Copy link
Owner

merging and going to handle rest of the cleanup in tree

@cujomalainey cujomalainey merged commit a2ea4d9 into cujomalainey:develop Jan 23, 2022
@cujomalainey
Copy link
Owner

update is squashed into original commit now as 3d695b9 so numbers have been removed from history

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants