I forgot to update the name of this function in the CI log so it looks like it's running the same test twice even though it's not. Co-authored-by: crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-on: #210 Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Actually log useful information at their respective log level. - Add logs in hot-paths to be able to deep-dive and debug specific requests (see server/handler.go) - Add more information to existing fields(e.g. the host that the user is visiting, this was noted by @fnetX). Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com> Reviewed-on: #116 Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
So we can access branch that contain slash like `branch/name` with `username.codeberg.page/repo/@branch~name/`. Branch name cannot contain `~` character but it can be in a HTTP URL, so replace the `~` from URL to `/` could be a valid solution to me. Resolve#101 Co-authored-by: Gary Wang <wzc782970009@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: #102 Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Gary Wang <blumia@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Gary Wang <blumia@noreply.codeberg.org>
solves #56. - The expected filename is `404.html`, like GitHub Pages - Each repo/branch can have one `404.html` file at it's root - If a repo does not have a `pages` branch, the 404.html file from the `pages` repository is used - You get status code 404 (unless you request /404.html which returns 200) - The error page is cached --- close#56 Reviewed-on: #81 Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: crystal <crystal@noreply.codeberg.org>
close#82close#32 make sure we dont get regressions again ... as we currently have in **main** followups: - create a DNS subdomayn specific to redirect to mock url ... Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Reviewed-on: #86 Reviewed-by: crapStone <crapstone@noreply.codeberg.org>