Skip to content

Conversation

@apurvis
Copy link
Contributor

@apurvis apurvis commented Feb 26, 2017

This is just a spec that would have caught the error in #80

if GLI can't parse its files, the return value will not be truthy. in general the fact that changes to the GLI files have no specs has always been a bit of a concern because we have only been catching them by manually running the commands; this solves a lot of that uncertainty

@apurvis
Copy link
Contributor Author

apurvis commented Feb 26, 2017

i'm just going to merge this since the specs are passing and it will prevent future errors.

@apurvis apurvis closed this Feb 26, 2017
@apurvis apurvis reopened this Feb 26, 2017
@apurvis apurvis merged commit dea0b4b into master Feb 26, 2017
@apurvis apurvis deleted the spec_for_gli_commands branch February 26, 2017 22:04
@slpsys
Copy link
Contributor

slpsys commented Feb 27, 2017

👍

@apurvis apurvis mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

4 participants