- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
Continue work on C++ packaging #97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
29 commits Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
c2b4edc After building packaging tools, upload them into an artifact so the r…
jonsimantov 92cba25 Add basic iOS and Android build and prereq scripts, and run them
jonsimantov f3b7e0b Fix indentation.
jonsimantov 8e41f7d Fix yaml syntax error.
jonsimantov 31ddbbc Add missing 'steps:' line.
jonsimantov 430307e Change naming of builds.
jonsimantov 8f069d6 Rename builds again.
jonsimantov b86b304 Fix OS check.
jonsimantov 376e640 Tweak prerequisites scripts.
jonsimantov 0065051 Fixes to build
jonsimantov 1966711 Removed tabs.
jonsimantov 715d578 Hyphens not underscores.
jonsimantov 4bf8cb8 Set ios build to use Xcode cmake generator.
jonsimantov 141a615 Fix android prereqs and build command.
jonsimantov ed2dab0 Add python packages to prereqs install
jonsimantov 82aa231 Fix CMake toolchain path.
jonsimantov f427975 Add platform checking. Windows will require a .bat file instead of th…
jonsimantov 3288599 Fix binutils packaging.
jonsimantov 41cb635 Add Android build artifact upload
jonsimantov 9f37af9 Fix packaging artifacts.
jonsimantov 206a7d8 Packaging script tweaks
jonsimantov 3701cb3 Remove tabs.
jonsimantov 77d1dda Renamed nm-new to nm
jonsimantov 4bc0f71 Moved artifacts back to .tgz files.
jonsimantov 0b83581 Removed tabs again.
jonsimantov 1053eea Merge branch 'dev' into feature/cpp-packaging2
jonsimantov ada0df2 Some small workflow fixes.
jonsimantov d291b90 Merge branch 'dev' into feature/cpp-packaging2
jonsimantov 6a53c9c Merge branch 'dev' into feature/cpp-packaging2
jonsimantov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Fix indentation.
- Loading branch information
commit f3b7e0b32c666d80f0252f6e3940f51b01bde3df
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By any chance, will we need a version number for these artifacts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK these artifacts are local to the workflow? So I don't think they need versioning. Later on in the workflow, all of these will be joined together into a single binary SDK artifact, and that will be versioned.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, can confirm - they're scoped by the workflow.