This article presumes your familiarity with various styling methods.
CSS-in-JS: Solutions it Aims to Provide:
- Scoped styles: Prevents style leakage to unrelated components.
- Dynamic styles: Enables style adaptability based on properties, state, or other dynamic data.
- Collocation: Enhances maintainability by co-locating styles and components.
The Mechanics of CSS-in-JS:
- Parsing styles: Transforms styles from JavaScript objects or tagged template literals into CSS format.
- Generating unique class names: Crafts a unique, hash-based class name for each style set, scoping them to designated components.
- Handling dynamic styles: Updates styles based on component properties or state changes, generates new class names if required, and injects the updated styles into the DOM.
- Injecting styles into the DOM: Constructs a
<style>
element, attaches it to the<head>
, and updates its content with the generated CSS. This action prompts the browser to recalculate styles. - Managing the CSS cache: Upholds a cache of generated styles to enhance performance and prevent unnecessary re-rendering.
- Server-side rendering: Extracts generated styles on the server and includes them in the initial HTML payload.
// Simplified CSS-in-JS implementation function parseStyles(styles) {...} function generateClassName(styles) {...} function injectStyles(css) {...} function updateDynamicStyles(component) {...} const styles = {color: "red", fontSize: "14px"}; const css = parseStyles(styles); const className = generateClassName(styles); injectStyles(css); element.className = className; updateDynamicStyles(component);
The Hurdles of styled
HOC
At its core, styled
offers a way to encapsulate styles within HTML elements.
const Button = styled.button` /* ... */ `;
However, this approach hinders style reusability across elements. Libraries offer the as
prop as a solution, but this often leads to poor abstractions and complicates TypeScript typing.
Check this example from styled-components
types:
export interface ThemedStyledFunction< C extends keyof JSX.IntrinsicElements | React.ComponentType<any>, T extends object, O extends object = {}, A extends keyof any = never > extends ThemedStyledFunctionBase<C, T, O, A> { // Fun thing: 'attrs' can also provide a polymorphic 'as' prop // My head already hurts enough so maybe later... attrs< U, NewA extends Partial<StyledComponentPropsWithRef<C> & U> & { [others: string]: any; } = {} >( attrs: Attrs<StyledComponentPropsWithRef<C> & U, NewA, T> ): ThemedStyledFunction<C, T, O & NewA, A | keyof NewA>; // ... }
Alternatively, we could utilize classes, circumventing the ordeal of identifying or modifying component HTML elements.
<Button as="a" />; // vs <> <button className={styles.button} /> {/* WOW: classes are making a comeback in frontend development */} <button className={clsx(styles.button, styles.hoverable)} /> <a className={styles.button} /> </>;
Issues with CSS-in-JS:
- Overhead due to runtime transformations
- Slower rendering phase compared to traditional CSS
- Additional CSS parser load on the browser
- Repeated CSS parsing and injection when values change
Measuring Performance Overhead:
This benchmark was used in styled-components
repo for performance overview (original repo).
But it was't fair enough because, styled-components
used inline styles for dynamic styles, that can't tell
anything about performance of dynamic styles.
How i fixed this issue
Original version:
const Dot = styled(View).attrs((p) => ({ style: { borderBottomColor: p.color }, }))` position: absolute; cursor: pointer; width: 0; height: 0; border-color: transparent; border-style: solid; border-top-width: 0; transform: translate(50%, 50%); margin-left: ${(props) => `${props.x}px`}; margin-top: ${(props) => `${props.y}px`}; border-right-width: ${(props) => `${props.size / 2}px`}; border-bottom-width: ${(props) => `${props.size / 2}px`}; border-left-width: ${(props) => `${props.size / 2}px`}; `;
So i just replaced inline styles with styled
const Dot = styled(View)` /* ... */ border-bottom-color: ${(props) => props.color}; /* ... */ `;
Overhead can range from [0.5x-2x] depending on the device or library, but they all use the same technique for styling
Benchmark was executed on a laptop with Ryzen 4600h, GTX 1650, 32 GB RAM.
Feel free to experiment with the benchmark playground: here
Fixed benchmark results:
Benchmark | Overhead of CSS in JS (styled-components) |
---|---|
Mounting deep tree | 20% |
Mounting wide tree | 13.1% |
Updating dynamic | 489.1% |
Updating static | 68.8% |
The performance of styled-components decreases fourfold when borderBottomColor is shifted from inline styles to styled.
Solutions:
- Limit the dynamic nature of style templates
- Utilize selectors and variables for dynamic components
- Transition to build-time CSS-in-JS libraries, such as Linaria
- For greenfield projects, contemplate the utility CSS approach (like Tailwind)
Benefits of Utility CSS Approach (Tailwind):
- Framework agnostic
- JIT compilation of classes for build-time dynamic classes
- Faster performance
- Transparent, zero-abstraction styling
- Easy setup in any environment
- Less code and adaptive abstractions
Top comments (1)
Сongratulations 🥳! Your article hit the top posts for the week - dev.to/fruntend/top-10-posts-for-f...
Keep it up 👍