I remember the predictable rhythm of the Dreamweaver era. Firing up Photoshop, I'd mock up a pristine website layout, slice buttons and images, then export everything into HTML tables or early CSS floats.
My process was predictable, my costs quantifiable. A client needed a landing page? "$500," I'd quote. That was 10 hours of design and code at $50/hour, minus a prorated slice of my Adobe subscription. Boom.
A local coffee shop needed a brochure site. I'd sketch wireframes on paper (yes, actual paper!), scan them, build the PSD, and meticulously slice the hero image into top/middle/bottom for that stretchy background hack.
The equation was simple:
Time × Skill = Output.
The Equation Breaks: Cost Basis Goes Stochastic
Fast forward to today, and that clean equation has shattered.
My workflow now involves prompting Midjourney for a logo concept, which feels less like designing and more like gambling in a high-stakes casino where the house is OpenAI or Adobe's AI suite.
One prompt might yield gold in three tries—a mere $0.30 in credits.
The next project? Fifty rerolls, desperately chasing that elusive "vibe," burning through $5 or more before I even consider vector export.
The harsh reality hit me on a recent client job for a custom app icon set. The "old me" would sketch in Illustrator, refine paths, and export SVGs—a predictable 4-hour task.
The "new me" started with:
/imagine minimalist coffee cup icon flat design material you --v 5.2.
The first batch? Utter trash. Tweak the prompt, add weights, introduce negative keywords.
I'm now an AI whisperer, meticulously crafting incantations, not simply a designer. Eight hours later, I finally land on a winner. But my input costs have become a true loot box.
My internal ledger now reads:
(Time + RNG Rolls × Cost Per Roll) × Vibe = Maybe Output
Maybe Output × Client Whim = Revenue
Revenue − (Subscription + API Credits + Hardware + Debugging Time) = ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The Freelance Contract: Designed for Predictability, Not Probability
This fundamental shift breaks the very foundation of freelancing. Traditional contracts were built on scope, estimated hours, and a buffer for revisions.
Now, my own cost basis is a probability distribution.
A web mockup might cost me $3 in DALL-E tokens or $47 if I'm meticulously iterating on responsive variants.
Worse, my skill no longer reliably reduces time; sometimes, my "expert" prompts take longer because I'm fighting the model's inherent noise to achieve a highly specific vision.
Every project feels like a micro-startup: I front the RNG costs, pray for a hit before burnout, and if it flops, I'm effectively subsidizing the client's jackpot with my gambling losses.
Are you experiencing this same shift from craftsman to gambler? How are you taming the RNG in your creative workflow? Share your strategies and frustrations in the comments below!
Top comments (5)
Creative jobs are not being taken by AI; they are being taken by people who know how to use AI. You need to be so efficient and the cost of the gamble is so low that you replace the high, predictable cost of the professional.
If pros normalize the loot box—if they start accepting "yeah, it's just RNG now, skill doesn't matter as much"—then literally nothing stops Karen from opening Midjourney herself and going "make it pop" seventeen times until something vaguely works.
The only thing that keeps Karen hiring you instead of DIYing is if you can credibly claim: "I deliver reliability, precision, and vision that you can't get by gambling yourself." But if you're visibly also gambling, iterating, and chasing vibes... why is she paying you premium rates for what she can do in her lunch break?
The professionalization was always the moat. You paid for certainty. For someone who knew what they were doing and would deliver on spec.
The moment that moat becomes "I'm better at prompt engineering than you" instead of "I have actual skill," you've lost. Because Karen will just get better at prompts. Or she'll hire the cheapest kid on Fiverr who's slightly better at it. Or she'll just accept "close enough" and move on.
The real danger isn't AI replacing creatives. It's AI making creative work so commodified and probabilistic that the entire profession collapses into DIY-or-cheap-labour tiers with nothing in the middle.
You can't charge premium rates for uncertainty. You used to charge premium rates for certainty. If you're selling uncertainty now, you've already lost to someone willing to accept it for free.
This captures the shift perfectly. AI has made creativity faster, but also way more unpredictable. What used to be a straightforward workflow with clear time estimates has turned into managing randomness, iteration costs, and model quirks. Many freelancers are dealing with the same volatility now — skill still matters, but the “RNG factor” has become a real part of the job. Your breakdown explains that new reality better than most people do.
Absolutely — the real competitive edge is no longer manual execution, but how effectively someone can direct AI systems. The low cost per iteration fundamentally changes the economics of creative work, and the people who embrace that shift naturally outpace the traditional workflow.
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.