Without further intro, let's just dive into the solutions: use Array.prototype.reduce AND (Set for primitive values OR Map for objects).
Here are the code:
For an array of primitive values
const uniqueArray = (array) => { return Array.from( array.reduce((set, e) => set.add(e), new Set()) ) } console.log(uniqueArray([1,2,2,3,3,3])) // [1, 2, 3] //OR simply const uniqueArray = (array) => Array.from(new Set(array)) For an array of objects
const uniqueArray = (objects, uniqueBy, keepFirst = true) => { return Array.from( objects.reduce((map, e) => { let key = uniqueBy.map(key => [e[key], typeof e[key]]).flat().join('-') if (keepFirst && map.has(key)) return map return map.set(key, e) }, new Map()).values() ) } let array = [ {a: 1, b: 2, c: 1}, {a: 1, b: 2, c: 2}, {a: 1, b: 3, c: 3} ] console.log(uniqueArray(array, ["a"], true)) // [ { a: 1, b: 2, c: 1 } ] console.log(uniqueArray(array, ["a"], false)) // [ { a: 1, b: 3, c: 3 } ] console.log(uniqueArray(array, ["a", "b"], true)) // [ { a: 1, b: 2, c: 1 }, { a: 1, b: 3, c: 3 } ] console.log(uniqueArray(array, ["a", "b"], false)) // [ { a: 1, b: 2, c: 2 }, { a: 1, b: 3, c: 3 } ] The reason we need to use Set and Map is because of the performance. You may have come across many implementations of getting unique values from an array in Javascript. Many of them will look like this:
- Create a new array, check if the element is not in the new array then push it to the new array, or
let array = [1,2,2,3,3,3] let uniqueArray = [] array.forEach(e => { if (!uniqueArray.includes(e)) uniqueArray.push(e) }) console.log(uniqueArray) // [1, 2, 3] - Use filter, check if the element appear the first time in the array then keep it, or
let array = [1,2,2,3,3,3] let uniqueArray = array.filter((e, index) => array.indexOf(e) === index) console.log(uniqueArray) // [1, 2, 3] - Use reduce, check if the element is not in the new array then use array destruction with the new element
let array = [1,2,2,3,3,3] let uniqueArray = array.reduce((newArray, e) => { if (newArray.includes(e)) return newArray; return [...newArray, e] }, []) console.log(uniqueArray) // [1, 2, 3] The problem is: they are slow. Let's do a quick benchmark. The benchmark below creates 5 arrays with 100,000 elements each. The first array contains all unique elements. The second array has each element appears 2 times. The third array has each element appears 3 times, and so on. All arrays are shuffled before getting unique values. We will use different methods to get the unique values in the array.
const usePush = (array) => { let uniqueArray = [] array.forEach(e => { if (!uniqueArray.includes(e)){ uniqueArray.push(e) } }) return uniqueArray } const useFilter = (array) => { return array.filter((e, index) => array.indexOf(e) === index) } const useReduceDestruct = (array) => { return array.reduce((pre, cur) => { if (pre.includes(cur)) return pre; return [...pre, cur] }, []) } const useReduceSet = (array) => { return Array.from( array.reduce((set, e) => set.add(e), new Set()) ) } //Create 5 big arrays with different number of duplicates for each element let bigArrays = [1,2,3,4,5].map(duplicates => { //duplicates = 1 means the array is unique //duplicates = 2 means each element appears 2 times, and so on return new Array(100000).fill(0) .map((_, i) => ({ rand : Math.random(), value : i - i % duplicates })) .sort((a,b) => a.rand - b.rand)//the array is random shuffled .map(e => e.value) }) bigArrays.forEach((array, index) =>{ console.log(`${index + 1} duplicate(s):`); [usePush, useFilter, useReduceDestruct, useReduceSet].forEach(fn =>{ let startTime = Date.now() fn(array) console.log(`${fn.name}${' '.repeat(20 - fn.name.length)} finished in ${((Date.now() - startTime)/1000).toFixed(3)} seconds`) }) }) Output:
1 duplicate(s): usePush finished in 5.395 seconds useFilter finished in 5.365 seconds useReduceDestruct finished in 72.743 seconds useReduceSet finished in 0.013 seconds 2 duplicate(s): usePush finished in 2.694 seconds useFilter finished in 3.555 seconds useReduceDestruct finished in 19.220 seconds useReduceSet finished in 0.008 seconds 3 duplicate(s): usePush finished in 1.818 seconds useFilter finished in 2.678 seconds useReduceDestruct finished in 8.659 seconds useReduceSet finished in 0.008 seconds 4 duplicate(s): usePush finished in 1.339 seconds useFilter finished in 2.155 seconds useReduceDestruct finished in 4.933 seconds useReduceSet finished in 0.006 seconds 5 duplicate(s): usePush finished in 1.123 seconds useFilter finished in 1.787 seconds useReduceDestruct finished in 2.970 seconds useReduceSet finished in 0.009 seconds It is clear that the more duplication we have in the array, the faster the code runs. It is also obvious that using Array.prototype.reduce and Set is the fastest among all.
Bonus: Getting unique values from an array of objects using multiple-level object keys (nested properties):
const uniqueArray = (objects, uniqueBy, keepFirst = true) => { const orderedObject = (value) => { if (typeof value !== "object") return value; return Object.keys(value).sort().reduce((pre, key) => { pre[key] = orderedObject(value[key]) return pre }, {}) } return Array.from( objects.reduce((map, e) => { let key = uniqueBy.map(prop => { let value = prop.split(".").reduce((object, cur) => object?.[cur], e) return [JSON.stringify(orderedObject(value)), typeof value] }).flat().join('-') if (keepFirst && map.has(key)) return map return map.set(key, e) }, new Map()).values() ) } let array = [ {a: [{x: 1}, 1], b: 2}, {a: [{x: 1}, 1], b: 2}, {a: [{x: 1, y: 2}, 2], b: 2} ] console.log( JSON.stringify(uniqueArray(array, ["a.0", "b"])) //Unique by `object["a"][0]` and `object["b"]` ) // [{"a":[{"x":1},1],"b":2},{"a":[{"x":1,"y":2},2],"b":2}] console.log( JSON.stringify(uniqueArray(array, ["a.0.x", "b"])) //Unique by `object["a"][0]["x"]` and `object["b"]` ) // [{"a":[{"x":1},1],"b":2}] 
Top comments (1)
Thanks for the solution.
Processing 33000 items the old way was taking 10s; with reduce+set, it takes 5ms !