Seminar in Public Policy Theory – Practice Gap & The Transition to a Theoretical Perspective
Theory – Practice  I did not complete my PhD until I was almost 50.  Prior to that, I’d had a long public service career and share what insights I’ve gleaned after 20 years as a ‘pracademic’.  Theory and Practice are very different in several ways.
Practice  A accumulation of experience and advice from other practitioners, usually limited to a fairly narrow field of practice (e.g. public utility in my case).  Tends to address specific situations; seeks solutions to current or immediate problems and challenges.  Much like a movie, it is a continuous series of changing scenes and situations.
Practice  Faces effectiveness tests in active systems or organizations.  germ theory of disease  ‘are the lights on’ in electric utility practice  Much like a movie, it is a continuous experience with constantly changing scenes and situations.
Theory  An accumulation of ‘scientific’ knowledge.  Social science is not the same as physical science  All water molecules do the same thing at 100 C  People do not react as predictably  Seeks generalizable explanations that comprehend or include multiple, theoretically allied or similar, situations across many practice fields or disciplines.  Incurs comparability problems  General may not be ‘true’ in some specific cases
Theory  Faces ‘peer review’ tests  Challenges of theoretical orthodoxy  The quasi-religious nature of aspirational ‘theory’  Rigidity of ‘basic’ assumptions that are wrong (e.g. politics – administration dichotomy)  More like snap shots
Theory – Practice Transition  Importance of theory and theoretical history.  Inconsistency with practical experience  Narrow focus of practical experience  Inaccurate theoretical inclusion or classification  Much social science ‘theory’ is actually aspirational rather than ‘science’ in the physical science sense.
Transition  Requires diligent effort to take theory seriously, in spite of its limitations and frequently aspirational character  Understand limitations of practical experience  Limited to a given field of practice (e.g. engineering)  Limited to a given context, culture or national environment
Value of a Transition  Become a true ‘pracademic’  Able to draw on theoretical assets, including research findings to improve practice.  Able to infuse theory with relevant experience  Use the best parts of both worlds in both worlds
Additional Benefits  Able to leap tall (theoretical) buildings in a single bound  Able to bridge the wildest (practical) rivers with ease  Bend public policy in your bare hands  Impress your friends; confuse your enemies

Theory practice gap: Transition from Practice to a Theoretical Perspective

  • 1.
    Seminar in PublicPolicy Theory – Practice Gap & The Transition to a Theoretical Perspective
  • 2.
    Theory – Practice I did not complete my PhD until I was almost 50.  Prior to that, I’d had a long public service career and share what insights I’ve gleaned after 20 years as a ‘pracademic’.  Theory and Practice are very different in several ways.
  • 3.
    Practice  A accumulationof experience and advice from other practitioners, usually limited to a fairly narrow field of practice (e.g. public utility in my case).  Tends to address specific situations; seeks solutions to current or immediate problems and challenges.  Much like a movie, it is a continuous series of changing scenes and situations.
  • 4.
    Practice  Faces effectivenesstests in active systems or organizations.  germ theory of disease  ‘are the lights on’ in electric utility practice  Much like a movie, it is a continuous experience with constantly changing scenes and situations.
  • 5.
    Theory  An accumulationof ‘scientific’ knowledge.  Social science is not the same as physical science  All water molecules do the same thing at 100 C  People do not react as predictably  Seeks generalizable explanations that comprehend or include multiple, theoretically allied or similar, situations across many practice fields or disciplines.  Incurs comparability problems  General may not be ‘true’ in some specific cases
  • 6.
    Theory  Faces ‘peerreview’ tests  Challenges of theoretical orthodoxy  The quasi-religious nature of aspirational ‘theory’  Rigidity of ‘basic’ assumptions that are wrong (e.g. politics – administration dichotomy)  More like snap shots
  • 7.
    Theory – PracticeTransition  Importance of theory and theoretical history.  Inconsistency with practical experience  Narrow focus of practical experience  Inaccurate theoretical inclusion or classification  Much social science ‘theory’ is actually aspirational rather than ‘science’ in the physical science sense.
  • 8.
    Transition  Requires diligenteffort to take theory seriously, in spite of its limitations and frequently aspirational character  Understand limitations of practical experience  Limited to a given field of practice (e.g. engineering)  Limited to a given context, culture or national environment
  • 9.
    Value of aTransition  Become a true ‘pracademic’  Able to draw on theoretical assets, including research findings to improve practice.  Able to infuse theory with relevant experience  Use the best parts of both worlds in both worlds
  • 10.
    Additional Benefits  Ableto leap tall (theoretical) buildings in a single bound  Able to bridge the wildest (practical) rivers with ease  Bend public policy in your bare hands  Impress your friends; confuse your enemies