Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byDatabricks
How to Automate Performance Tuning for Apache Spark
The document discusses performance tuning for Apache Spark, highlighting key parameters and configurations that can dramatically affect performance. It emphasizes the need for automation in performance tuning to alleviate the tedious and time-consuming manual processes that consume significant engineering resources. Additionally, the architecture of an automated tuning solution is outlined, showcasing its ability to optimize Spark jobs based on historical data and heuristics.
How to Automate Performance Tuning for Apache Spark
- 1. WIFI SSID:Spark+AISummit |Password: UnifiedDataAnalytics
- 2. Jean-Yves Stephan &Julien Dumazert, Founders of Data Mechanics Automating performance tuning for Apache Spark #UnifiedDataAnalytics #SparkAISummit
- 3. What is performancetuning? 3 Cluster parameters ● Size ● Instance type ● # of processors ● # of memory ● Disks ● ... Spark configurations ● Parallelism ● Shuffle ● Storage ● JVM tuning ● Feature flags ● ...
- 4. Why automate performancetuning? 4 Pick new params Analyze logs Run the job
- 5. Why automate performancetuning? 5 Pick new params Analyze logs Run the job Pager ringing at 3am 30% of your engineers time Missing SLAs every week Hard manual work Frequent outages Slow and expensive
- 6.
- 7.
- 8. Perf tuning isan iterative process For the first run There are rules of thumb for some params: • # of partitions: 3x the number of cores in the cluster • # of cores per executor: 4-8 • memory per executor: 85% * (node memory / # executors by node) For the other params: make an educated guess! 8
- 9. Perf tuning isan iterative process On the first attempt, the job crashes or does not meet the SLA. What to do? 9 Pick new params Analyze logs Run the job • Ensure stability of the job • Solve performance issues • Adjust speed-cost trade-off
- 10. Common issues: lackof parallelism 10 Only 8 cores used on each machine! Configuration: • 26 instances n1-highmem-16 • spark.executor.cores = 16
- 11. Common issues: lackof parallelism Configuration: • 26 instances n1-highmem-16 • spark.executor.cores = 16 11 Only 8 cores used on each machine! The reason: • 26 executors • spark.sql.shuffle.partitions = 200 → 200 / 26 ~ 7.7 tasks per executor Fix: Use 400+ partitions (duration and cost / 2) See also Adaptive execution (SPARK-23128) for a way to dynamically and automatically set the number of partitions.
- 12. Common issues: shufflespill 12 The deserialized data produced by the map stages in a shuffle does not fit in memory. Spark temporarily writes it to disk, which degrades performance. Fixes: 1. Reduce the input data of each task by increasing the number of partitions 2. Increase the memory available to each task – by increasing spark executor memory – by decreasing the number of cores per executor
- 13. Common issues: dataskew 13 This issue is not addressable with parameter tuning. A change in code is required! Change in code: 1. Find a better partition key if possible 2. Use a map-side (broadcast) join 3. Use a salted key
- 14. Improvements based onnode metrics 14 ● Low CPU Usage => Consider oversubscription, ie telling Spark to schedule say 2x more tasks per executor than the number of cores ● Low Memory Usage => Consider pruning the excess memory and switching to CPU-intensive instances ● IO bound queries => Consider switching instance type or Spark IO configurations such as compression or IO buffer sizes
- 15. Cost-speed trade-off 15 On theefficient frontier: cheaper ⇒ longer shorter ⇒ more expensive Once performance issues are solved, adjust your trade-off given your needs. Efficient frontier Solving performance issues Adjusting cost-speed trade-off
- 16. Cost-speed trade-off 16 40 instances 10instances 4 instances Example: impact of # of instances
- 17. Recap: manual perftuning Iterative process: 17 Solve performance issues Adjust cost-speed tradeoff Most of the impact comes from a few parameters: • # and type of instances for execs and driver • executor and driver size (memory, # of cores) • # of partitions
- 18. Open source tuningtools To detect performance issues: DrElephant (LinkedIn) To simulate cost-speed trade-off: SparkLens (only supports adjusting # of executors) 18
- 19.
- 20. Motivations Performance tuning canmake periodic workloads 2x faster and more stable. But: • tedious manual process • requires expertise → to scale it to 100+ pipelines, automation is required! 20 Pick new params Analyze logs Run the job
- 21. Architecture (tech) 21 Scheduler SparkjobGateway Optimization engine Data Mechanics Kubernetes cluster Customer code Job history Spark listener 1) Unoptimized Spark job description 2) Optimization engine identifies job from history and returns config 3) Optimized Spark job description 4) An agent exports event logs and system metrics during job run
- 22. Architecture (algo) 23 Jun 2ndJun 3rd Jun 4th Jun 5th Jun 6th Jun 7th
- 23. Architecture (algo) 24 Heuristic A Jun 2ndJun 3rd Jun 4th Jun 5th Jun 6th Heuristic B Jun 7th Spark events log and metrics
- 24. Architecture (algo) 25 Heuristic A Jun 2ndJun 3rd Jun 4th Jun 5th Jun 6th Evaluator A Heuristic B Evaluator B Param set A1 Param set A3 Param set B2 Jun 7th Spark events log and metrics Evaluators leverage historical data
- 25. Architecture (algo) 26 Heuristic A Jun 2ndJun 3rd Jun 4th Jun 5th Jun 6th Evaluator A Heuristic B Evaluator B Experiment manager Param set A1 Param set A3 Param set B2 Evaluated param set B2 Evaluated param set A1 Jun 7th Spark events log and metrics Evaluators leverage historical data
- 26. Architecture (algo) 27 Heuristic A Jun 2ndJun 3rd Jun 4th Jun 5th Jun 6th Evaluator A Heuristic B Evaluator B Experiment manager Param set A1 Param set A3 Param set B2 Evaluated param set B2 Evaluated param set A1 Jun 7th Optimistic best param set Spark events log and metrics Evaluators leverage historical data
- 27. Heuristics Heuristics look forperformance issues: • FewerTasksThanTotalCores • ShuffleSpill • LongShuffleReadTime • LongGC • ExecMemoryLargerThanNeeded • TooShortTasks • CPUTimeShorterThanComputeTime • … 28 Or push in a given direction: • IncreaseDefaultNumPartitions • IncreaseTotalCores • … Heuristic A Jun 6th Heuristic B Spark events log and metrics Param sets Every heuristic proposes different param sets.
- 28. Heuristics example FewerTasksThanTotalCores If astage has fewer tasks than the total number of cores: 1. Increase the default number of partitions if applicable 2. Decrease the number of instances 3. Decrease the # of cores per instance (and adjust memory) 29 Heuristic A Jun 6th Heuristic B Spark events log and metrics Param sets
- 29. Ranking param sets Paramsets cost and duration are evaluated by Evaluators. The Experiment manager selects the best solution according to customer settings. 30 Evaluator A Evaluator B Experiment manager Optimistic best param set Unevaluated param sets
- 30. Evaluator Estimates cost andduration distributions. • From history if possible • By simulation otherwise The simulation: an optimistic model of the Spark scheduler. • Takes as input a Spark app (Spark events log) • Simulates a new execution under different conditions • Different # of partitions, cores / exec, execs • Optimistic assumptions: no GC time, no shuffle read time Why optimistic? Encourages exploration! 31 Evaluator Unevaluated param set Evaluated param set (cost and duration) History
- 31. Experiment manager Selects thebest param set given customer objectives like: • as cheap as possible within maximum duration • as fast as possible within budget • finish at 6am no matter what Contains Bayesian optimization logic to account for noise. 32 Experiment manager Optimistic best param set Evaluated param sets (cost and duration)
- 32. Architecture (algo) 33 Heuristic A Jun 2ndJun 3rd Jun 4th Jun 5th Jun 6th Evaluator A Heuristic B Evaluator B Experiment manager Param set A1 Param set A3 Param set B2 Evaluated param set B2 Evaluated param set A1 Jun 7th Optimistic best param set Spark events log and metrics Evaluators leverage historical data
- 33. 34 ● Stability: Automaticremediation of OOMs and timeouts (upon retry) ● Performance: 50% cost reduction. ● Algorithm typically converges and adapts to changes in 5-10 iterations. Impact of automated tuning
- 34. Data Mechanics platform 35 ●A managed platform for containerized Spark apps in your cloud account ● Just send your code, we automate the scaling and configurations tuning ● Pricing based on real Spark compute time, not on idle server uptime. Gateway Data source Data engineers Data scientists
- 35. The hassle-free Sparkplatform powered by Kubernetes Learn more and sign up for private beta on https://www.datamechanics.co Also, we’re hiring :) jobs@datamechanics.co
- 36. DON’T FORGET TORATE AND REVIEW THE SESSIONS SEARCH SPARK + AI SUMMIT