TestCon Vilnius October 19, 2017 Kari Kakkonen, Knowit Oy, FiSTB, ISTQB @kkakkonen Exploratory testing – basics, experiences and future? Knowit 1
Kari Kakkonen ROLES • Knowit Oy, Director/Quality and Competences, Lead Consultant, Trainer and Coach • Treasurer of ISTQB Executive Committee • Chairman of Finnish Software Testing Board (FiSTB) • Auditor of Robot Framework Foundation. ACHIEVEMENTS • Influencing testing since 1996 • Ranked in 100 most influential IT persons in Finland (Tietoviikko magazine) • Great number of presentations in Finnish and international conferences • TestausOSY/FAST founding member. • Co-author of Agile Testing Foundations book • Regular blogger in Tivi-magazine EDUCATION • ISTQB Expert Level Test Management Full & Advanced Full & Agile Tester certified • DASA DevOps Fundamentals, Scrum Master and SAFe certified • SPICE provisionary assessor certified • M.Sc.(Eng), Helsinki University of Technology (present Aalto University), Otaniemi, Espoo • Marketing studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, the USA. BUSINESS DOMAINS • Wide spread of business domain knowledge • Embedded, Industry, Public, • Training, Telecom, Commerce, • Insurance, Banking, Pension SERVICES • ISTQB Advanced, Foundation and Agile Testing + Knowit Quality Professional • DASA DevOps Fundamentals • Quality & Test process and organization development, Metrics • Agile testing, Scrum, Kanban, Lean • Leadership • Test automation, Mobile, Cloud, DevOps • Quality, Cost, Benefits. Twitter: @kkakkonen LinkedIn: fi.linkedin.com/in/karikakkonen/ Knowit 2
What is it? Knowit 4
Characterization of exploratory testing • ”Planning and execution of testing is done at the same time” (After James Bach) • Test cases are not necessarily documented even afterwards (Cem Kaner) • Testing is done iteratively piece by piece • Continuous learning and interpretation of conceptions • Utilization of knowledge gained from experience 5© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Exploratory testing - terms • Adventure may go to sidetrack as long as you come back to mainroad again (Kaner) • Testing area: a bunch of functionalities • Testing session • Duration about ½ - 2 hours • Time span of concentrated work is about 20 minutes • Getting back to work takes about 20 minutes 6© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
An example: www.Topsellers.Com, a fictional e-commerce shop • Test case: ”Log in. Browse the content of your shopping cart. Result: Shopping cart is empty, because no items have been picked.” • During testing it is noticed that the shopping cart contains items! Items have been picked with the same user account and the e-commerce shop keeps the earlier picked things in shopping cart. • Aftertaste: ”The test should have considered this. Let’s change the test data and the test itself, and design a new test case, which takes into account that the shopping cart can store items.” • A familiar situation? 7© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Learning in exploratory testing 8© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Testing Opinion-forming Reporting Designing actions Observations After reference: Psychology of Usability, Sinkkonen et al.
Learning from the system and customers • What has changed or changes frequently? • What do the customers want? • What has been defined in an ambiguous way? • Where do faults cluster? • Weaknesses in the platform or programming language • System dependencies 9© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: Lessons learned in software testing. Kaner, Bach, Pettichord
Learn from other testers, designers, from yourself • What kind of errors do certain programmers make and how to report to and communicate with them • What typical errors can there be in the system • What functionalities have been built in a hurry • What have you misunderstood and what is typically misunderstood • How can the system be tested (especially in pair testing!) 10© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Why exploratory testing? Knowledge-based perspective • Exploit the natural diversity of people in testing *) • ”Do not plan for store” • Systematic variation of testing • Quick feedback to the designers intensifies learning process *) • Spread the knowledge of a tester of a special area 11© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential *) Reference: Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
Why exploratory testing? Testers’ approach • Want to add more test cases and increase the coverage of the tests *) • For defining the degree of automation of tests • Quick overview of the quality *) • Testing the side effects of changes – scripted testing can end up testing only the documented features *) • The problem in regression testing is the selection of test cases, which requires user experience and understanding of the system • When the test documentation can not be written in advance *) 12© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential *) Reference: Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
Why exploratory testing? Management approach • Low management costs of test documentation • Finding out the features of a poorly-documented component • Optimizing the productivity of testing? • When the available workload is limited *) • When you want to train the customer support at the same time 13© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential *) Reference: Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
Where exploratory testing fits 14 Different styles of testing Adhoc testing Exploratory Testing And Session-Based Test Management High level test cases design and execution Detailed test cases design and execution ET + SBTM High level TC Detailed TC Automation Automated testing and ATDD Exploratory Testing ET Systematicnessoftesting Adhoc ET Scripted testing
Exploratory testing as part of test strategy 15© Knowit Oy Confidental 2012 Pure (100%) scripted testing Scripted testing Exploratory testing Pure (100%) exploratory testing Where do you put the focus of your own testing?Maybe here?
How is it done? Knowit 16
Step by step © Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Plan • Test charter Test session • Notes / Log • Bugs Debriefing • Dashboard
Exploratory testing in Prague – find a park • Test charter • ”look for green” 1819.10.2017 © Copyright Knowit Oy 2013 | Confidential | Version 1.0
Exploratory testing in Prague – find a park • Test execution log • Dashboard 1919.10.2017 © Copyright Knowit Oy 2013 | Confidential | Version 1.0
Exploratory testing in Prague – find a park • Defect report 2019.10.2017 © Copyright Knowit Oy 2013 | Confidential | Version 1.0
Test design in a test charter • Define the testing areas of the test object • Divide each area to one or more test sessions • Test charter works as a roadmap per test session • Define test cases to be documented • heuristic: less than 10% of all tests • Write down test ideas and/or high level test cases 21© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Purpose of test charter(s) • What will be tested? • What documents are available? • What kind of errors are being sought? • Tasks and what test techniques will be used? • Targets and outputs (for example reports) 22© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: A practioner’s guide to software test design. Copeland Ref. Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
Charter classic example Area Coverage and working hours Practice Documents Result possible errors Risks R1. Customer’s all selected items are not added to order, Effect: 20 eur/buyer, probability 5% R2. Order can not be completed after interruption, 5, probability: ?? Main page 100% Path coverage (direct paths) and the most common (80% used) loops 10h Scripting with Functional Tester-tool Main page display description document, navigation map (COMING FROM DEVELOPMENT) All pages and the shopping cart are available Shopping cart 5h Shopping cart- UC.doc (use case) Shopping cart can be used in the same way as a real shopping cart The same product can not be added to shopping cart several times Emptying the shopping cart causes an execption R1 Order ? Order-UC.doc? R2 23© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Exploratory Testing – Test Charter another view 24© Copyright Knowit Oy 2017 | Confidential • Actor: intended user of the system • Purpose: the theme of the charter including what particular objective the actor wants to achieve, i.e., the test conditions • Setup: what needs to be in place in order to start the test execution • Priority: relative importance of this charter, based on the priority of the associated user story or the risk level • Reference: specifications (e.g., user story), risks, or other information sources • Data: whatever data is needed to carry out the charter • Activities: a list of ideas of what the actor may want to do with the system and what would be interesting to test (both positive and negative tests) • Oracle notes: how to evaluate the product to determine correct results • Variations: alternative actions and evaluations to complement the ideas described under activities Reference: ISTQB Agile Tester syllabus
Charter as an excel 25© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Documents supporting testing • Charter • List of different testing strategies • Lists of heuristics • List of typical errors • Kaner’s bug taxonomies*) • Legal notices, standards, de facto-standards • Requirements and design documentation of the system • Self made description and models of the system behavior • User guide *) 26© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential *) Reference: Testing Computer Software. Kaner et al. **) Reference: Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
Kaner’s bug taxonomies: • User interface errors • Error handling • Boundary-related errors • Calculation errors • Initial and later states • Control Flow errors • Errors in handling or interpreting data • Race conditions • Load Conditions • Hardware • Source and version control • Documentation • Testing errors 27© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: Testing computer software, p. 60 – 64
Exploratory Testing - Heuristics • A set of heuristics can be applied when testing. • A heuristic can guide the tester in how to perform the testing and to evaluate the results, few examples below 28© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Heuristics Examples Boundaries: Approaching the Boundary e.g. almost too big, almost too small, at the Boundary CRUD Create, Read, Update, Delete Configuration variations Varying the variables related to configuration e.g. Screen Resolution; Network Speed, Latency, Signal Strength; etc. Interruptions e.g., log off, shut down, or reboot Source: Elisabeth Hendrickson www.testobsessed.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/testheuristicscheatsheetv1.pdf
Performance attitude - professional working • Keep the targets of testing in mind • You can visit bypaths but only for a moment • Write down observations and questions about the system • Report in a disciplined and systematical way • During the execution, write only the most essential test cases and in high level • Test cases can be refined later 29© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Tests are designed during execution • Define a test from a question • Design test on the basis of charter and test ideas • A surprising situation may indicate an error: Utilize the surprise effect! • Heuristics e.g. • ”Backwards thinking”: ”This button saves the definition text. I wonder what other ways are there for saving the text?” 30© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Note taking: test execution logs • Keep a test execution log • Keep track of the tests carried out • Main thing is that executed tests are noted • You may create scripted test cases of some of the tests • Keep the most important test cases that have been executed, which show how the testing has been done, e.g. what values have been used • You may record your execution • Write down also test notes for test session post-mortem and your own learning 31© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Test charter and test log in mindmap (Xmind) 32© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Note taking: defect logs • In defect reporting, traceability to the requirements must be maintained so that coverage can be evaluated • A well written error log is the best evidence of the existence of a fault • Report a bug clearly, so that the failure can be repeated • You may use defect reporting systems 33© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Testing dashboard as a test report - an example 34© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Test area Workload Coverage Quality level/risks Comment Main page !Interrupted High, 5h Very high [all parts + stress tests etc..] 49: 1435, 36: 1469, 42: 1501 wait for more pictures of user interface Shopping cart !Started High, 2h (reserved 4h) Low [main parts to testing] (High) 81: 1425 [probability 9 x effect 9; error number. 1425] Order !Done 6h (reserved 4h) High [all parts] Feedback !Not done Low (reserved 1h) Low [main parts to testing]
Measuring exploratory testing • The duration of the session • The relative change in the number of test cases by the same tester • Coverage of testing per session • The number of interruptions (Suspension criteria) • Number of rejected defects in defect database • … • Metrics are the eyeglasses of testing that you need in order to be fully aware of the situation and potential problems in testing •  It is recommended that you choose metrics that are suitable for the challenges of exploratory testing 35© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Some Tools • Notetaking: • Screenshots With Annotation • Video with Annotation • Intergrated bug reporting • Test Management tool suite add-ons • Micro Focus / HPE Sprinter • QA Symphony qTest eXplorer • Telerik Test Studio Explore • qMetry Voyager • Steps Recorder • Recording Browser extensions • Bug Magnet • Notepad++ (pad tools in general) • Xmind, Mindmup (mindmap tools in general) • Rapid Reporter 36© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential • Test charter planning • Charters • Priorization • Test Management tool suites • Trello • Jira Agile • Micro Focus / HPE Agile Manager • Pivotal Tracker • Excel
Who can do it? Knowit 37
Who to recruit? The profile of an exploratory tester • Exploratory testing is particularly well suitable for a person, who… • likes to take risks • is not afraid of changes or new things • is open-minded • sets challenges and goals to themselves • is smart and quick in finding test conditions • ”Pioneer-style” • Everyone can learn to be an exploratory tester 38© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: Choosing and Managing the Ideal Test Team. Lloyd Roden
Exploratory testing requires learning skills • Outline the functionality of the system on paper • Aim at understanding • Don’t force yourself to remember facts, use documents • Ask questions about the functionality of the system • Recognize the items on which you need more information 39© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: Tutkiva oppiminen. Hakkarainen et al.
Improve your testing thinking skills • Observe your own testing habits • Recognize your own ways of thinking • Learn from misunderstandings and mistakes • Select the testing techniques according to the situation *) • Improve your skills to deduce the states of the system *) 43© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Adapted from the reference: Tutkiva oppiminen. Hakkarainen et al., *) Reference: Rapid Software Testing. James Bach
What in future? Knowit 44
Exploratory future • Exploratory testing will become the norm in agile testing • And agile will be the norm for all development • Testing tools suites will include exploratory testing charters and logging • Coverage will be proven with both last quantities of well-logged exploratory testing and some formally designed test cases • With test automation to make sure the basics work, testers will be free to find important defects with exploratory testing • People will start exploring also with test automation • Keyword driven and data-driven approaches • AI will help with some of exploratory Testing © Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
Questions? kari.kakkonen@knowit.fi @kkakkonen
10/19/2017 Knowit 47 Creating digital opportunities

Exploratory Testing Basics and Future

  • 1.
    TestCon Vilnius October19, 2017 Kari Kakkonen, Knowit Oy, FiSTB, ISTQB @kkakkonen Exploratory testing – basics, experiences and future? Knowit 1
  • 2.
    Kari Kakkonen ROLES • KnowitOy, Director/Quality and Competences, Lead Consultant, Trainer and Coach • Treasurer of ISTQB Executive Committee • Chairman of Finnish Software Testing Board (FiSTB) • Auditor of Robot Framework Foundation. ACHIEVEMENTS • Influencing testing since 1996 • Ranked in 100 most influential IT persons in Finland (Tietoviikko magazine) • Great number of presentations in Finnish and international conferences • TestausOSY/FAST founding member. • Co-author of Agile Testing Foundations book • Regular blogger in Tivi-magazine EDUCATION • ISTQB Expert Level Test Management Full & Advanced Full & Agile Tester certified • DASA DevOps Fundamentals, Scrum Master and SAFe certified • SPICE provisionary assessor certified • M.Sc.(Eng), Helsinki University of Technology (present Aalto University), Otaniemi, Espoo • Marketing studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, the USA. BUSINESS DOMAINS • Wide spread of business domain knowledge • Embedded, Industry, Public, • Training, Telecom, Commerce, • Insurance, Banking, Pension SERVICES • ISTQB Advanced, Foundation and Agile Testing + Knowit Quality Professional • DASA DevOps Fundamentals • Quality & Test process and organization development, Metrics • Agile testing, Scrum, Kanban, Lean • Leadership • Test automation, Mobile, Cloud, DevOps • Quality, Cost, Benefits. Twitter: @kkakkonen LinkedIn: fi.linkedin.com/in/karikakkonen/ Knowit 2
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Characterization of exploratorytesting • ”Planning and execution of testing is done at the same time” (After James Bach) • Test cases are not necessarily documented even afterwards (Cem Kaner) • Testing is done iteratively piece by piece • Continuous learning and interpretation of conceptions • Utilization of knowledge gained from experience 5© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 6.
    Exploratory testing -terms • Adventure may go to sidetrack as long as you come back to mainroad again (Kaner) • Testing area: a bunch of functionalities • Testing session • Duration about ½ - 2 hours • Time span of concentrated work is about 20 minutes • Getting back to work takes about 20 minutes 6© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 7.
    An example: www.Topsellers.Com, afictional e-commerce shop • Test case: ”Log in. Browse the content of your shopping cart. Result: Shopping cart is empty, because no items have been picked.” • During testing it is noticed that the shopping cart contains items! Items have been picked with the same user account and the e-commerce shop keeps the earlier picked things in shopping cart. • Aftertaste: ”The test should have considered this. Let’s change the test data and the test itself, and design a new test case, which takes into account that the shopping cart can store items.” • A familiar situation? 7© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 8.
    Learning in exploratorytesting 8© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Testing Opinion-forming Reporting Designing actions Observations After reference: Psychology of Usability, Sinkkonen et al.
  • 9.
    Learning from thesystem and customers • What has changed or changes frequently? • What do the customers want? • What has been defined in an ambiguous way? • Where do faults cluster? • Weaknesses in the platform or programming language • System dependencies 9© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: Lessons learned in software testing. Kaner, Bach, Pettichord
  • 10.
    Learn from othertesters, designers, from yourself • What kind of errors do certain programmers make and how to report to and communicate with them • What typical errors can there be in the system • What functionalities have been built in a hurry • What have you misunderstood and what is typically misunderstood • How can the system be tested (especially in pair testing!) 10© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 11.
    Why exploratory testing? Knowledge-basedperspective • Exploit the natural diversity of people in testing *) • ”Do not plan for store” • Systematic variation of testing • Quick feedback to the designers intensifies learning process *) • Spread the knowledge of a tester of a special area 11© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential *) Reference: Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
  • 12.
    Why exploratory testing? Testers’approach • Want to add more test cases and increase the coverage of the tests *) • For defining the degree of automation of tests • Quick overview of the quality *) • Testing the side effects of changes – scripted testing can end up testing only the documented features *) • The problem in regression testing is the selection of test cases, which requires user experience and understanding of the system • When the test documentation can not be written in advance *) 12© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential *) Reference: Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
  • 13.
    Why exploratory testing? Managementapproach • Low management costs of test documentation • Finding out the features of a poorly-documented component • Optimizing the productivity of testing? • When the available workload is limited *) • When you want to train the customer support at the same time 13© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential *) Reference: Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
  • 14.
    Where exploratory testingfits 14 Different styles of testing Adhoc testing Exploratory Testing And Session-Based Test Management High level test cases design and execution Detailed test cases design and execution ET + SBTM High level TC Detailed TC Automation Automated testing and ATDD Exploratory Testing ET Systematicnessoftesting Adhoc ET Scripted testing
  • 15.
    Exploratory testing aspart of test strategy 15© Knowit Oy Confidental 2012 Pure (100%) scripted testing Scripted testing Exploratory testing Pure (100%) exploratory testing Where do you put the focus of your own testing?Maybe here?
  • 16.
    How is itdone? Knowit 16
  • 17.
    Step by step ©Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Plan • Test charter Test session • Notes / Log • Bugs Debriefing • Dashboard
  • 18.
    Exploratory testing inPrague – find a park • Test charter • ”look for green” 1819.10.2017 © Copyright Knowit Oy 2013 | Confidential | Version 1.0
  • 19.
    Exploratory testing inPrague – find a park • Test execution log • Dashboard 1919.10.2017 © Copyright Knowit Oy 2013 | Confidential | Version 1.0
  • 20.
    Exploratory testing inPrague – find a park • Defect report 2019.10.2017 © Copyright Knowit Oy 2013 | Confidential | Version 1.0
  • 21.
    Test design ina test charter • Define the testing areas of the test object • Divide each area to one or more test sessions • Test charter works as a roadmap per test session • Define test cases to be documented • heuristic: less than 10% of all tests • Write down test ideas and/or high level test cases 21© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 22.
    Purpose of testcharter(s) • What will be tested? • What documents are available? • What kind of errors are being sought? • Tasks and what test techniques will be used? • Targets and outputs (for example reports) 22© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: A practioner’s guide to software test design. Copeland Ref. Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
  • 23.
    Charter classic example AreaCoverage and working hours Practice Documents Result possible errors Risks R1. Customer’s all selected items are not added to order, Effect: 20 eur/buyer, probability 5% R2. Order can not be completed after interruption, 5, probability: ?? Main page 100% Path coverage (direct paths) and the most common (80% used) loops 10h Scripting with Functional Tester-tool Main page display description document, navigation map (COMING FROM DEVELOPMENT) All pages and the shopping cart are available Shopping cart 5h Shopping cart- UC.doc (use case) Shopping cart can be used in the same way as a real shopping cart The same product can not be added to shopping cart several times Emptying the shopping cart causes an execption R1 Order ? Order-UC.doc? R2 23© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 24.
    Exploratory Testing –Test Charter another view 24© Copyright Knowit Oy 2017 | Confidential • Actor: intended user of the system • Purpose: the theme of the charter including what particular objective the actor wants to achieve, i.e., the test conditions • Setup: what needs to be in place in order to start the test execution • Priority: relative importance of this charter, based on the priority of the associated user story or the risk level • Reference: specifications (e.g., user story), risks, or other information sources • Data: whatever data is needed to carry out the charter • Activities: a list of ideas of what the actor may want to do with the system and what would be interesting to test (both positive and negative tests) • Oracle notes: how to evaluate the product to determine correct results • Variations: alternative actions and evaluations to complement the ideas described under activities Reference: ISTQB Agile Tester syllabus
  • 25.
    Charter as anexcel 25© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 26.
    Documents supporting testing •Charter • List of different testing strategies • Lists of heuristics • List of typical errors • Kaner’s bug taxonomies*) • Legal notices, standards, de facto-standards • Requirements and design documentation of the system • Self made description and models of the system behavior • User guide *) 26© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential *) Reference: Testing Computer Software. Kaner et al. **) Reference: Exploratory testing: A multiple case study. Itkonen, Rautiainen
  • 27.
    Kaner’s bug taxonomies: •User interface errors • Error handling • Boundary-related errors • Calculation errors • Initial and later states • Control Flow errors • Errors in handling or interpreting data • Race conditions • Load Conditions • Hardware • Source and version control • Documentation • Testing errors 27© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: Testing computer software, p. 60 – 64
  • 28.
    Exploratory Testing -Heuristics • A set of heuristics can be applied when testing. • A heuristic can guide the tester in how to perform the testing and to evaluate the results, few examples below 28© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Heuristics Examples Boundaries: Approaching the Boundary e.g. almost too big, almost too small, at the Boundary CRUD Create, Read, Update, Delete Configuration variations Varying the variables related to configuration e.g. Screen Resolution; Network Speed, Latency, Signal Strength; etc. Interruptions e.g., log off, shut down, or reboot Source: Elisabeth Hendrickson www.testobsessed.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/testheuristicscheatsheetv1.pdf
  • 29.
    Performance attitude -professional working • Keep the targets of testing in mind • You can visit bypaths but only for a moment • Write down observations and questions about the system • Report in a disciplined and systematical way • During the execution, write only the most essential test cases and in high level • Test cases can be refined later 29© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 30.
    Tests are designedduring execution • Define a test from a question • Design test on the basis of charter and test ideas • A surprising situation may indicate an error: Utilize the surprise effect! • Heuristics e.g. • ”Backwards thinking”: ”This button saves the definition text. I wonder what other ways are there for saving the text?” 30© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 31.
    Note taking: testexecution logs • Keep a test execution log • Keep track of the tests carried out • Main thing is that executed tests are noted • You may create scripted test cases of some of the tests • Keep the most important test cases that have been executed, which show how the testing has been done, e.g. what values have been used • You may record your execution • Write down also test notes for test session post-mortem and your own learning 31© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 32.
    Test charter andtest log in mindmap (Xmind) 32© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 33.
    Note taking: defectlogs • In defect reporting, traceability to the requirements must be maintained so that coverage can be evaluated • A well written error log is the best evidence of the existence of a fault • Report a bug clearly, so that the failure can be repeated • You may use defect reporting systems 33© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 34.
    Testing dashboard asa test report - an example 34© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Test area Workload Coverage Quality level/risks Comment Main page !Interrupted High, 5h Very high [all parts + stress tests etc..] 49: 1435, 36: 1469, 42: 1501 wait for more pictures of user interface Shopping cart !Started High, 2h (reserved 4h) Low [main parts to testing] (High) 81: 1425 [probability 9 x effect 9; error number. 1425] Order !Done 6h (reserved 4h) High [all parts] Feedback !Not done Low (reserved 1h) Low [main parts to testing]
  • 35.
    Measuring exploratory testing •The duration of the session • The relative change in the number of test cases by the same tester • Coverage of testing per session • The number of interruptions (Suspension criteria) • Number of rejected defects in defect database • … • Metrics are the eyeglasses of testing that you need in order to be fully aware of the situation and potential problems in testing •  It is recommended that you choose metrics that are suitable for the challenges of exploratory testing 35© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 36.
    Some Tools • Notetaking: •Screenshots With Annotation • Video with Annotation • Intergrated bug reporting • Test Management tool suite add-ons • Micro Focus / HPE Sprinter • QA Symphony qTest eXplorer • Telerik Test Studio Explore • qMetry Voyager • Steps Recorder • Recording Browser extensions • Bug Magnet • Notepad++ (pad tools in general) • Xmind, Mindmup (mindmap tools in general) • Rapid Reporter 36© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential • Test charter planning • Charters • Priorization • Test Management tool suites • Trello • Jira Agile • Micro Focus / HPE Agile Manager • Pivotal Tracker • Excel
  • 37.
    Who can doit? Knowit 37
  • 38.
    Who to recruit?The profile of an exploratory tester • Exploratory testing is particularly well suitable for a person, who… • likes to take risks • is not afraid of changes or new things • is open-minded • sets challenges and goals to themselves • is smart and quick in finding test conditions • ”Pioneer-style” • Everyone can learn to be an exploratory tester 38© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: Choosing and Managing the Ideal Test Team. Lloyd Roden
  • 39.
    Exploratory testing requireslearning skills • Outline the functionality of the system on paper • Aim at understanding • Don’t force yourself to remember facts, use documents • Ask questions about the functionality of the system • Recognize the items on which you need more information 39© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Reference: Tutkiva oppiminen. Hakkarainen et al.
  • 40.
    Improve your testingthinking skills • Observe your own testing habits • Recognize your own ways of thinking • Learn from misunderstandings and mistakes • Select the testing techniques according to the situation *) • Improve your skills to deduce the states of the system *) 43© Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential Adapted from the reference: Tutkiva oppiminen. Hakkarainen et al., *) Reference: Rapid Software Testing. James Bach
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Exploratory future • Exploratorytesting will become the norm in agile testing • And agile will be the norm for all development • Testing tools suites will include exploratory testing charters and logging • Coverage will be proven with both last quantities of well-logged exploratory testing and some formally designed test cases • With test automation to make sure the basics work, testers will be free to find important defects with exploratory testing • People will start exploring also with test automation • Keyword driven and data-driven approaches • AI will help with some of exploratory Testing © Copyright Knowit Oy 2015 | Confidential
  • 43.
  • 44.
    10/19/2017 Knowit 47 Creatingdigital opportunities