pydantic VS CPython

Pydantic Documentation

Found in issue where maintainer answered that they are only going to support JSON

https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/discussions/4097

The solution? Leverage Pydantic, a Python library that enables runtime data validation using type annotations.

Pydantic author here. We have plans for an improvement to pydantic where JSON is parsed iteratively, which will make way for reading a file as we parse it. Details in https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/issues/10032.

Our JSON parser, jiter (https://github.com/pydantic/jiter) already supports iterative parsing, so it's "just" a matter of solving the lifetimes in pydantic-core to validate as we parse.

This should make pydantic around 3x faster at parsing JSON and significantly reduce the memory overhead.

Across this five-post series, we’ve journeyed from Pydantic’s basics—type validation and nested models—to advanced integrations with FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, and scalable techniques. You’ve learned how to build declarative, type-safe models, handle complex APIs, and optimize performance. To deepen your knowledge, explore the Pydantic documentation, contribute to the open-source project, or experiment with real-world use cases. Check out our GitHub repo for code samples and a Pydantic cheat sheet. Thank you for joining us—happy coding!

To dive deeper, check out the Pydantic documentation for advanced features like nested models, custom validators, and settings management. Happy coding!

Pydantic is bundled with FastAPI and is excellent for modelling, validating, and serialising API responses.

Pydantic Settings is a python library that extends 🚀 Pydantic for dealing with settings management.

Here's the relevant diff: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/137968/files#diff-966...

Search is limited to 20 attributes and non-descriptors only to avoid arbitrary code execution.

I assume constructing AttributeErrors isn't highly performance sensitive.

If there is an audience for release notes I haven't seen anything better than just committing entries to pre-release folder as you change things and have release automation compile the folder into the actual release notes. Python and many other large projects handle it like this: https://github.com/python/cpython/tree/main/Misc/NEWS.d/next (The release notes for major releases are crafted manually)

Python Software Foundation. Python Programming Language. https://www.python.org/

import smtplib from email.mime.text import MIMEText from email.mime.multipart import MIMEMultipart from email.mime.base import MIMEBase from email import encoders # SMTP Server details port = 587 smtp_server = "smtp.sendlayer.net" username = "paulie" # Your username generated by SendLayer password = "sendlayer_smtp_password" # Your password generated by SendLayer sender_email = "paulie@example.com" receiver_email = "johndoe@example.com" # Email content subject = "Email Example with Attachment" html_message = """\ Hi, This is a test email sent from "https://www.python.org">Python using "https://sendlayer.com">SendLayer's SMTP server The email also includes an attachment """ # Create a multipart message and set headers message = MIMEMultipart() message["From"] = sender_email message["Subject"] = subject message["To"] = receiver_email # Attach the HTML part message.attach(MIMEText(html_message, "html")) # Specify the file path for the attachment filename = "./path/to/attachment/file.pdf" # Change this to the correct path # Open the file in binary mode with open(filename, "rb") as attachment: part = MIMEBase("application", "octet-stream") part.set_payload(attachment.read()) # Encode file in ASCII characters to send by email encoders.encode_base64(part) # Add header as key/value pair to attachment part part.add_header("Content-Disposition", f"attachment; filename= {filename}") # Add attachment to message message.attach(part) # Send the email with smtplib.SMTP(smtp_server, port) as server: server.starttls() server.login(username, password) server.sendmail(sender_email, receiver_email, message.as_string()) print('Email sent successfully')

import requests from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor URLS = [ "https://www.python.org/", "https://www.djangoproject.com/", "https://flask.palletsprojects.com/", ] def fetch_url(url: str): print(f"Fetching {url}...") response = requests.get(url) print(f"Fetched {url} with status {response.status_code}") return len(response.content) with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=5) as executor: # The map function runs `fetch_url` for each item in URLS results = executor.map(fetch_url, URLS) for url, length in zip(URLS, results): print(f"URL: {url}, Length: {length}")

Use KeysView and ValuesView instead of dict_keys and dict_values respectively because type checkers don't support dict_keys and dict_values in _collections_abc.

According to the benchmark in the PR that introduced this optimization, sorting a list that consists only of floats rather than a list of floats with even a single integer at the end is almost twice as fast.

If you want to a UUIDv7 key for partitioning your table by date (e.g., one partition per day or month), you need to be able to compute the partition range via the minimal UUIDv7 for a given date.

There is some discussion whether or not to add helpers for this to Python‘s uuid7 module: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/130843#issuecomment...

With respect to tagged pointers, there seems to be some recent movements on that front in CPython: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/132509