Added const declaration #5
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| @rojasleon thank you - sorry for the slow response here, but I'll definitely merge this one into the next course update. |
simonprickett approved these changes Jun 8, 2021
gonzaldd pushed a commit to gonzaldd/redis-ru102js that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
Added const declaration
yarisahyadi added a commit to yarisahyadi/CrowdFide that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
yarisahyadi added a commit to yarisahyadi/CrowdFide that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
RandyOtero added a commit to rotejim/ru102js that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2023
iralvarez-77 added a commit to iralvarez-77/ru102js that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey there!
I'm taking this awesome course and I realized there's a small typo in the code (technically not a typo, but a bad practice).