Skip to content

Conversation

@walshmm
Copy link
Contributor

@walshmm walshmm commented Sep 22, 2025

Short description of the changes:

Long description of the changes:

Check list for the pull request

  • I have read the [CONTRIBUTING]
  • I have read the [CODE_OF_CONDUCT]
  • I have added tests for my changes
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

Check list for the reviewer

  • I have read the [CONTRIBUTING]
  • I have verified the proposed changes
  • best software practices
    • all internal functions have an underbar, as is python standard
    • clearly named variables (better to be verbose in variable names)
    • code comments explaining the intent of code blocks
  • All the tests are passing
  • The documentation is up to date
  • code comments added when explaining intent

Manual test for the reviewer

References

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.45%. Comparing base (482595c) to head (3d3b2b8).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #73 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 93.25% 93.45% +0.19%  ========================================== Files 10 10 Lines 1023 1023 ========================================== + Hits 954 956 +2  + Misses 69 67 -2 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants