Skip to content

Conversation

@darioAnongba
Copy link
Contributor

@darioAnongba darioAnongba commented Nov 3, 2025

RFQ buy/sell accepts are now written to the database (rfq_policies table) whenever a policy is agreed, giving us an audit trail and keeping quotes across restarts.

The OrderHandler reloads these rows at startup to rebuild policies and the manager repopulates its in-memory caches from the same data.

Added a check in itest that restarts Bob’s tapd mid RFQ flow and verifies the quote remains available to Carol.

Fixes #855

@darioAnongba darioAnongba self-assigned this Nov 3, 2025
@darioAnongba darioAnongba changed the base branch from main to 0-8-0-staging November 3, 2025 14:45
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 3, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19360530476

Details

  • 433 of 576 (75.17%) changed or added relevant lines in 5 files are covered.
  • 59 unchanged lines in 13 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+7.1%) to 56.608%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
tapdb/sqlc/rfq.sql.go 53 61 86.89%
rfq/manager.go 11 27 40.74%
rfq/order.go 61 98 62.24%
tapdb/rfq_policies.go 301 383 78.59%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
fn/context_guard.go 1 91.94%
tapdb/sqlc/mssmt.sql.go 2 48.34%
tapdb/sqlc/transfers.sql.go 2 83.33%
itest/assertions.go 3 87.42%
itest/multisig.go 3 97.94%
tapdb/mssmt.go 4 90.45%
tapgarden/re-org_watcher.go 4 73.49%
mssmt/compacted_tree.go 6 78.11%
tapdb/multiverse.go 6 80.59%
tapfreighter/chain_porter.go 6 83.05%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 19360481010: 7.1%
Covered Lines: 64757
Relevant Lines: 114395

💛 - Coveralls
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19038516198

Details

  • 425 of 603 (70.48%) changed or added relevant lines in 5 files are covered.
  • 507 unchanged lines in 39 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 56.265%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
rfq/manager.go 14 21 66.67%
tapdb/sqlc/rfq.sql.go 58 74 78.38%
rfq/order.go 28 72 38.89%
tapdb/rfq_policies.go 318 429 74.13%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
proof/courier.go 1 78.88%
asset/asset.go 2 79.97%
asset/group_key.go 2 72.15%
fn/func.go 2 58.82%
tapdb/assets_common.go 2 77.97%
tapdb/migrations.go 2 76.19%
tapdb/sqlc/mssmt.sql.go 2 47.02%
tapdb/sqlc/transfers.sql.go 2 82.65%
tapdb/universe_federation.go 2 88.55%
tapdb/universe.go 2 80.35%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 18942913401: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 64373
Relevant Lines: 114410

💛 - Coveralls
@darioAnongba darioAnongba force-pushed the feat/persist-rfq branch 2 times, most recently from 98bcb62 to 5a2bd52 Compare November 3, 2025 15:17
@darioAnongba darioAnongba marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2025 15:17
@levmi levmi moved this from 🆕 New to 🏗 In progress in Taproot-Assets Project Board Nov 3, 2025
@levmi levmi added this to the v0.8 milestone Nov 3, 2025
Copy link
Member

@GeorgeTsagk GeorgeTsagk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a few nits, will do a final pass soon

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
package rfq
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: file should be named policy_store.go


// cleanupStalePolicies removes expired policies from the local cache.
func (h *OrderHandler) cleanupStalePolicies() {
func (h *OrderHandler) cleanupStalePolicies() error {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you only seem to return nil here, why not remove error?

@darioAnongba darioAnongba moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Taproot-Assets Project Board Nov 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

6 participants