Skip to content

Conversation

@carlaKC
Copy link
Contributor

@carlaKC carlaKC commented Nov 3, 2025

Needs some serious cleaning up, so please don't review yet!

Opening up early because I'll be out till the 10th, want to have a passing version of these up in the meantime.

To be used in the commits that follow for zero fee commitment test vectors.
In v3 test vectors, we're using real preimages so won't be able to use the workaround here.
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Nov 3, 2025

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.29%. Comparing base (3f96d12) to head (83a1f30).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #4202 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 89.28% 89.29% +0.01%  ========================================== Files 180 180 Lines 137913 137913 Branches 137913 137913 ========================================== + Hits 123134 123154 +20  + Misses 12163 12149 -14  + Partials 2616 2610 -6 
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzing 33.49% <ø> (+1.87%) ⬆️
tests 88.69% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants