[9.x] Add whereNot method to Fluent JSON testing matchers #43383
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Whoopsie. Will check tests when I get back home. |
| @mateusjatenee How is this different than the |
| @morloderex if we could figure out a nice way to handle the callback I don't think it'd be much different. The goal is to just make sure that a certain item does not exist (by filtering) — right now |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have a use case where I want to test that a given item does not exist on a JSON collection.
I found it a bit difficult to do this with the existing API, but it is quite possible (and likely) that I just missed something.
Here's an example of my use case: https://twitter.com/mateusjatenee/status/1550574619995815936
The tests are a bit messy because I started out scoping then and then implementing (tried out a couple different things as well), but if the PR looks good I can make them a little better.