1

I have a Cisco ASA 5510, running ASA software version 9.1(7)16 on an IPv6 LAN.

I want to enable SSH access, but I'm running up against the following warning:

ciscoasa(config)# show ipv6 interface management IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is fe80::21d:a2ff:fe59:4b97 No global unicast address is configured Joined group address(es): ff02::2 ff02::1 ff02::1:ff59:4b97 ICMP error messages limited to one every 100 milliseconds ICMP redirects are enabled ND DAD is enabled, number of DAD attempts: 1 ND reachable time is 30000 milliseconds ND advertised reachable time is 0 milliseconds ND advertised retransmit interval is 1000 milliseconds ND router advertisements are sent every 200 seconds ND router advertisements live for 1800 seconds Hosts use stateless autoconfig for addresses. ciscoasa(config)# ssh fe80::/64 management WARNING! This command will not take effect until interface 'management' has been initialized with at least one global IPv6 address ciscoasa(config)# 

(SSH connections to this address fail, although when I configured and tested an IPv4 address, it was able to connect)

So, my question is: what do I need to do to allow SSH connections to my ASA 5510's link-local IPv6 address?

I don't care if I have to e.g., set up a dummy address in the "Documentation Only" IPv6 range to get it to fire up the SSH IPv6 stack, or statically assign the link-local address, or what: I just need to be able to access it on the same subnet as the rest of the devices in this environment.

1 Answer 1

1
  1. Hopefully obviously, the interface needs to be enabled for IPv6

    ipv6 enable 
  2. A static IPv6 address needs to be configured on the interface, this static address can be a documentation (rfc3849) address, or a statically assigned link local address, or a public address (even if not publicly routable

    ipv6 address 2001:db8::/32 
2
  • Argh; what a ridiculous workaround. (I'm glad it works, though; and thank you for sharing!) Is there no "proper" way to do this? Is this dummy address the only way to proceed? Commented Aug 8, 2017 at 18:29
  • Wouldn't it be better to use a ULA address like fdab:abf2:00b7::1 for this? Commented Nov 24, 2017 at 0:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.