0

I'm running some VMs on Azure inside of a Virtual Network that I manually configured. For the most part, these VMs just run unattended and if I ever need remote access to them, I just assign a public IP address and log in via RDP.

I was looking into configuring outbound internet access for these VMs and I quickly realised that this is supported by default with Azure Virtual Networks (with the default Gateway being the first IP address associated with the subnet).

When I first started to research how to enable outbound internet connectivity for these VMs, my initial research led me to a solution of adding a NAT Gateway to the Virtual Network. In my case, I don't have any functional requirement for all my VMs to share the same public IP address so I'm happy to use the default configuration of the Virtual Network (it's simpler - and requires no configuration) - however, I'm curious, is there any advantage to using a NAT Gateway for outbound internet access vs using the default configuration of Virtual Networks on Azure?

1 Answer 1

1

A outbound NAT gateway in Azure exists purely to resolve the issue of having a static outbound IP for all resources in a vNet. If you don't need that, then it doesn't provide you any benefit.

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.