Enhancement: Added ExcludeAll option for toll filtering #2789
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
| Well, this is a good start! The next step would be to ensure these flags get taken into account by router |
Collaborator
| Let's merge this and continue the work in a separate PR |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #2789 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 56.45% 56.45% ======================================= Files 319 319 Lines 30878 30878 ======================================= Hits 17433 17433 Misses 11946 11946 Partials 1499 1499 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
jhrozek approved these changes Nov 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #2779
I just added new fields to their respective places but i didin't know if i should proceed in configuring these fields in the specs since it is a use-case based thing.
Feel free to tell me if you want me to do so and if so, please let me know what use-cases should i consider.