Use cache for DictExpr as well #19536
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅ |
sterliakov approved these changes Jul 30, 2025
I already closed couple others, but didn't do any kind of thorough tracker review. |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #14271
Fixes #14636
TBH examples in those issues are already sufficiently fast (probably because of combined effect of fast dict literals, and the fact that there are some lists and/or function calls in that examples, so some caching already kicks in). But this PR will probably make them even faster.
This has ~0 effect on self-check.