Skip to content

Conversation

@Caideyipi
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

As the title said.


This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
    • concurrent read
    • concurrent write
    • concurrent read and write
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious
    for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold
    for code coverage.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.

Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) in this PR
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 7.66423% with 253 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 39.15%. Comparing base (302864a) to head (205cd19).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...e/sink/protocol/opcua/client/IoTDBOpcUaClient.java 0.00% 94 Missing ⚠️
.../pipe/sink/protocol/opcua/client/ClientRunner.java 0.00% 69 Missing ⚠️
...otocol/opcua/client/IoTDBKeyStoreLoaderClient.java 0.00% 46 Missing ⚠️
...e/iotdb/db/pipe/sink/protocol/opcua/OpcUaSink.java 22.00% 39 Missing ⚠️
...ipe/sink/protocol/opcua/server/OpcUaNameSpace.java 64.28% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #16944 +/- ## ============================================ - Coverage 39.18% 39.15% -0.04%  Complexity 212 212 ============================================ Files 5050 5053 +3 Lines 335097 335354 +257 Branches 42717 42739 +22 ============================================ - Hits 131321 131320 -1  - Misses 203776 204034 +258 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant