This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 7, 2025. It is now read-only.
Update collatz.js #67
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Better docs, refactoring, support for negatives, protection against infinite loops, etc...
| I haven't tested it yet, that's why it's a draft. Please be patient, I'll test later |
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Strict mode, better docs, refactoring, support for negatives, protection against infinite loops, etc...
I am creating a pull request for...
"Collatz conjecture" is not a sequence. The standard-de-facto name convention is "Hailstone sequence", that's why I edited the comments.
I added JSdoc to explicitly specify the expected type of
n, to reduce the likelihood of misuse of that function