2
$\begingroup$

Let $\{X_n\}_{n \geq 1}$ be a sequence of random variables adapted to the filtration $\{\mathcal{F}_n\}_{n \geq 1}$. If $X_n \to X$ a.s., does it follow that \begin{equation*} \mathbb{E}\left[X_n \, \big| \, \mathcal{F}_{n-1}\right] \to X \text{ a.s.?} \end{equation*}

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I gave an example of this not holding true as stated below, but I wonder if this holds if it is assumed that $X_n \to X$ in $L^1$ in addition to almost surely. $\endgroup$ Commented 10 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ If $X_n \to X$ in $L_1$, then, I think, the statement is true: $\| \mathbb{E}[X_n | \mathcal{F}_{n-1}] - X \| \leq \| \mathbb{E}[X_n | \mathcal{F}_{n-1}] - X_{n-1} \| + \| X_{n-1} - X\| = \| \mathbb{E}[X_n -X_{n-1} | \mathcal{F}_{n-1}] \| + \| X_{n-1} - X\|$, etc $\endgroup$ Commented 2 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ My argument proves $L_1$ convergence, but not almost sure convergence. $\endgroup$ Commented 2 hours ago

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Not necessarily. Let $Y_n$ be independent $0$-$1$ valued Bernoulli random variables with $Y_n = 1$ with probability $\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}$, and set

$$X_n = \sum_{k =1}^n 2^{k} Y_k.$$

By Borel-Cantelli, almost surely only finitely many of the $Y_n$ take value $1$, so $X_n$ converges almost surely to some $X$ that takes values in the set of integers.

However$$\mathbb E[X_n | \mathcal F_{n-1}] = X_{n-1} + \mathbb E[2^n Y_n] = X_{n-1} + \frac{1}{2},$$

which is an integer plus $\frac{1}{2}$ almost surely. So for every $n$, $|\mathbb E[X_n| \mathcal F_{n-1}] - X| \geq \frac{1}{2}$, almost surely.

Thus we cannot have the desired a.s. convergence.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a $p > 0$ such that the expectation of $X^p$ is finite? $\endgroup$ Commented 3 hours ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.