2
$\begingroup$

I am trying to prove this theorem, Let $X=\prod_{i=1}^n X_i $.

Theorem: Let $f: X \rightarrow X_i$ is a projection map (i.e., surjective with connected fibers) and $ g: X\rightarrow Z$ is a proper morphism that is constant on the fibers of $f$, then there exist a unique morphism $h: X_i \rightarrow Z$ such that $g=h \cdot f$.

I am stuck proving this. Is it a standard theorem, that I can locate in Hartshorne exercise? Or is it wrong?

I know there is something called $Stein$ $factorisation$,(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stein_factorization#CITEREFEGA) that says,

For a proper morphism $F: X \rightarrow Y$, one can write $F=G\cdot F'$, where $G: Y' \rightarrow Y$ a finite morphism and $F': X \rightarrow Y'$ a proper morphism with direct image of structure sheaf is a structure sheaf.

Now, I am stuck on how to apply and prove our case, if possible.

Any help regarding this would be immensely helpful. Thank you.

New contributor
Anubhab Pahari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

By faithfully flat descent for morphisms of schemes, if $f \colon X \to X_i$ is faithfully flat and $g\colon X\to Z$ is an arbitrary morphism of schemes, then there exists a unique morphism $h \colon Z_i \to Z $ such that $g = h\cdot f $ if (and in fact only if) the pullbacks of $h$ to $X \times_{X_i} X$ along the two projections $X \times_{X_i} X \to X$ are equal.

Your conditions "surjective with connected fibers" do not imply faithfully flat, but the projection $f$ is faithfully flat: Any morphism from a nonempty scheme to the spectrum of a field is faithfully flat so in particular $\prod_{j \neq i }X_j \to \operatorname{Spec} k$ is, and faithfully flat morphisms are preserved by base change, so $f$ is as well.

Your condition "constant on the fibers of $f$" implies that the pullbacks of $h$ to $X \times_{X_i} X$ along the two projections $X \times_{X_i} X \to X$ are equal as long as $X \times_{X_i} X$ is reduced (for example if the $X_i$ are all reduced over a field of characteristic zero): In this case, it suffices to check the equality at every point of $X \times_{X_i} X$, which lies in the product of one of the fibers of $f$ with itself, so it suffices to check that the value of $h$ at the two points in the fiber are the same, which is the same as constancy.

Being a little careful I think one can check the implication just using the assumption that $X_i$ is reduced. Your desired statement is certainly not true if $X_i$ is not reduced.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ In my case, $X_i$ are reduced. Thank you so much, for this nice answer. Grateful. $\endgroup$ Commented 13 hours ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.