8
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a compact convex subset of the plane. Let $c_1$, $c_2$ and $c_3$ be non-collinear points in the interior of $X$.

For every point $x$ on the boundary $\partial X$, you can draw the line from $x$ through $c_1$ and continue it until it meets $\partial X$ in another point, which I'll call $f_1(x)$. This gives a homeomorphism $f_1: \partial X \to \partial X$. Define $f_2, f_3: \partial X \to \partial X$ similarly. For example:

Illustration of previous paragraph

Let $G$ be the subgroup of the group of self-homeomorphisms of $\partial X$ generated by $f_1$, $f_2$ and $f_3$. Then $G$ acts in a natural way on $\partial X$.

Question Is the $G$-orbit of every point of $\partial X$ dense in $\partial X$?

Equivalently, is it true that every closed subset $A$ of $\partial X$ that's completely invariant under each $f_i$ (meaning that $A = f_1 A = f_2 A = f_3 A$) is either empty or the whole of $\partial X$?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I do not have an answer, although after playing with it for an hour or so, I suspect that the answer is yes. Note that you can reduce to dynamics on the boundary of the triangle $T = c_1 c_2 c_3$: fix some $c$ in the interior of $T$, and map $x \in \partial X$ to the intersection $p(x)$ of $\partial T$ with the line from $x$ to $c$. This map $p$ is a homeomorphism so it gives a conjugate action on $\partial T$ generated by $p \circ f_i \circ p^{-1}$, $i = 1,2,3$. Minimality (every orbit is dense) is a conjugacy invariant, so it suffices to show it on $\partial T$. $\endgroup$ Commented 14 hours ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note re: the title of the question: topological transitivity usually means that there is at least one dense orbit. Minimality means that every orbit is dense. $\endgroup$ Commented 13 hours ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is false even if $X$ is a closed round disk: You can have configurations such that the closure of every orbit is totally disconnected. To achieve this, pick points $c_i$ sufficiently close to the vertices of an inscribed triangle. $\endgroup$ Commented 12 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ @SophieM Thanks. Title changed accordingly. $\endgroup$ Commented 3 hours ago

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Consider the case when $X$ is a closed round disk in the plane with the interior (open disk) $H$ and boundary circle $C$. I will regard $H$ as a Klein model on the hyperbolic plane, whose isometries are projective transformations preserving $H$. Then, given a point $c\in H$ and defining the corresponding involution $\theta_{c}: C\to C$ as in your question, one checks that $\theta_{c}$ is the restriction of a projective involution of $X$, a hyperbolic isometry of $H$. (I will leave it to you to verify this.) Let $\Gamma$ be a subgroup of the isometry group of $H$ generated by three involutions $\theta_{c_i}, i=1,2,3$. For every point $x\in C$, the accumulation set of the orbit $\Gamma x$ is the limit set $\Lambda$ of $\Gamma$. It turns out that $\Lambda$ does not depend on $x$ and if $\Gamma$ is discrete, then $\Lambda$ equals $C$ if and only if $H/\Gamma$ has finite area ($\Gamma$ is a lattice). If $\Gamma$ is discrete then $\Lambda$ either equals $C$, or is homeomorphic to the Cantor set or consists of at most two points.

Let $H_i$ be hyperbolic half-planes in $H$ bounded by lines $L_i$ in $H$ through the points $c_i$. If one can find $H_i$'s which are pairwise disjoint, then the complement $F$ to their union is a fundamental domain of $\Gamma$ acting on $H$ (in particular, $\Gamma$ is discrete). The hyperbolic area of $F$ is the area of $H/\Gamma$. If $L_i$'s are not just disjoint but (at least) two of them have disjoint closures in $X$, then $F$ has infinite area. Thus, to find a counter-example to your conjecture, it suffices to take $c_i$'s which are sufficiently close to three pairwise distinct points in $C$.

In my answer I used standard results on Fuchsian groups. You can find detailed proofs for instance in Beardon's book "Geometry of discrete groups." (Apart from the discussion of the Klein model.)

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think any of the theory is needed here. Just pick three (let's say: equidistant) points $c_j$ on $C$ and move them slightly inside. Since $f_j$ maps most of $C$ to a small neighborhood of $c_j$ and these are well separated, it's clear that for typical $x\in C$, we stay inside these neighborhoods. $\endgroup$ Commented 8 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristianRemling: If one just wants to prove that some orbits are not dense, this argument suffices. But what I wrote is stronger. $\endgroup$ Commented 8 hours ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.