The same post's presented on mathstackexchange, but I think this one is a research level question.
I was preparing for my postgraduate exams and one of the questions concerned constructing non-isomorphic boolean algebras with isomorphic automorphism groups. I know that it's proved using Stone's representation and a fact from topology (that there are actually spaces, satisfying the requirements). It's natural to expect those algebras to exist, because it's too strong condition to be fully described by own automorphism group.
So after learning it the question arouse: why would anyone construct such algebras? More generally, are there any (algebraic) structures that are solely defined by their own automorphism group? Formally let $A,B$ be algebraic structures and $\text{Aut}(A), \text{Aut}(B)$ be their automorphism groups. For which classes of structures it follows: $$\tag{1}\label{1}\text{Aut}(A) \cong \text{Aut}(B) \implies A \cong B \; ?$$
It's relatively obvious, that non-empty finite sets satisfy the requirements (as noted on mse). It's a bit tricky, but we can show that it's still true for any non-empty sets. Are there any other non-trivial examples of this situation. Can we deduce any properties of those structures, satisfying $\eqref{1}$? Probably Aut group must be big comparing to the structure itself (if we use the analogy from Sets).