Background
According to A program for the full axiom of choice, forcing has a computational interpretation and a realizability models. However, this paper also mentions that it is not possible to obtain realizability models for V = L by the same route.
In particular, L inhabited at the bottom of the inner model theory. According to $K$ without the measurable, we can generate many core models K such that the axioms $V = K$ and ZFC are relatively consistent, as long as there is no Woodin cardinals and $j: K \to K$.
In the other hand, inner model for KP/Z/... has a lot to study. e.g.
- $\sf KP + V = L$ vs. admissible ordinal
- $\sf KP + V = L_{\omega_1}$ is the preferred model for Countabilism
- $\sf KP + V = L_{\omega_1^{CK}}$ has a $\mathit{\Delta}^1_1$-good well-ordering of $\mathbb{R}$
Question
- What are the main obstacles to constructing a realizability model/computational interpretation for an core models/inner models?
- Or, Are there known constructive ideas?