2
$\begingroup$

Assume that convex $f: S \to \mathbb{R}$ with $L$-Lipschitz continuous gradient on some convex compact $S \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ is given. It would be very helpful if there existed function $F$ such that $F(x) = f(x)$ for all $x \in S$ and $F$ is convex and has $L$-Lipschitz continuous gradient on the whole $\mathbb{R}^d$. I suppose that $F(x) = \sup \{g(x)\;|\;g\text{ is convex, has }L\text{-Lipscitz continuous gradient and }g \leq f\}$ can be a candidate for such an "lower smooth convex envelope", but cannot see if it's so and how to prove it if it is. I would be grateful for any recommendations. Explicit construction is not necessary, at least existence would be enough.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I would assume the "right" choice is something like $F(x) := \sup_{y \in S}\big( f(y) + \langle \nabla f(y),x-y \rangle\big)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 21, 2023 at 1:48
  • $\begingroup$ @DustinG.Mixon, I was thinking about this function too, but I was not able to show that its gradient has the same Lipschitz constant. I stuck at the moment of proving non-expansiveness of $y^* =\arg\max_y\{\dotsi\}$ operator, which differs from projection in that it satisfies $\langle \nabla^2 f(y^*)[x-y^*],z-y^*\rangle \leq 0$, and non-expansiveness holds in some specific local norm associated with x,y, which has spectrum proportional to Hessian, so Lipschitz constant scales as well. I don't see how to avoid this :( $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 21, 2023 at 7:29
  • $\begingroup$ As far as I am aware, the answer to the question is not known. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 21, 2023 at 18:38

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Such an extension is not always possible, a counterexample can be found in Section 2 of https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02419v3.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.