3
$\begingroup$

For a positive integer $n$ let $$f(n):=\min\{m\in \mathbb N: m>1, \gcd(m,n)=1\} .$$ Equivalently, $f(n) $ is the smallest prime not dividing $n$. Is there any upper bound literature for this? It is not difficult to prove that $$ \#\{1<m\leq x: \gcd(m,n)=1 \} \geq \frac{\phi(n) }{n } x-1-2^{\omega(n) }, $$ hence, $$f(n) \leq 2 + 2^{\omega(n) }\frac{n }{\phi(n) }\leq 2+ 4^{\omega(n ) } .$$ If $n=\prod_{p\leq t}p$ then $f(n) \asymp t \asymp \omega(n) \log \omega(n)$, so perhaps something polynomial in $\omega(n)$ might be achievable for general $n$. Is it possible to improve this as function of $\omega$? PS. I do not care about bounds without $\omega$, since these are easy. For example, all primes $p<f(n)$ must divide $n$ hence $$ \prod_{p<f(n) } p \leq n \Rightarrow f(n) \ll \log n.$$

$\endgroup$
7
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ I guess that $\omega(n)$ is the number of distinct prime factors of $n$. If $f(n)=p_{m+1}$ is the $(m+1)$-th prime, then $n$ must be divisible by $p_1\cdots p_m$, hence $f(n) \ll m \log m \ll \omega(n) \log \omega(n)$. Your example shows one cannot hope for a better bound. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 1, 2021 at 19:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ While I am not sure if this helps but bounds on average of $f(n)$ have been proven in corollary 3 here. arxiv.org/abs/0912.2508 $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 1, 2021 at 19:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @François Brunault: thanks, this is exactly what I was hoping for! $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 1, 2021 at 22:12
  • $\begingroup$ OEIS A053669 gives a very unique closed form expression, which is reproduced below. $$a(n) = 1 + \sum_{k=1}^{n} \left( \left\lfloor \frac{n^k}{k!} \right\rfloor - \left\lfloor \frac{n^k - 1}{k!} \right\rfloor \right)$$ $\endgroup$ Commented May 22, 2024 at 16:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @GHfromMO I've turned my comment into an answer. $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2024 at 7:37

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

If $f(n) = p_{m+1}$ is the $(m+1)$-th prime, then $n$ must be divisible by $p_1 \cdots p_m$, hence $f(n) \ll m \log m \ll \omega(n) \log \omega(n)$. Your example shows one cannot hope for a better bound.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Let $f(n)$ be the least prime not dividing $n$. If $p_k$ is the $k$-th prime, $m\geq 1$ is an integer, and $$q_m = \prod_{k=1}^m p_k,$$ then $f(q_m)=p_{m+1}$. Indeed, $q_m$ is the least positive integer at which $f$ equals $p_{m+1}$, so we find that $f$ is maximized along the sequence of primorials $q_m$.

By the prime number theorem, we have $$q_m = e^{(1+o(1))m\log m},\qquad p_{m+1}=(1+o(1))m\log m.$$ Thus, $$f(e^{(1+o(1))m\log m})=(1+o(1))m\log m.$$ Inverting this relationship, we find that $$f(n) = (1+o(1))\log n$$ when $n$ is a primorial. Since $f$ is maximized along the primorials, we find that $$f(n)\leq (1+o(1))\log n$$ for all $n\geq 2$. Using explicit forms of the prime number theorem, one could bound the $o(1)$ term completely explicitly.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ not sure why you repeated parts of the first post to be honest. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 1, 2021 at 22:11
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Dr.Pi for the sake of having a self-contained answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 1, 2021 at 22:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.