1
$\begingroup$

Let $M=- U^{-1} U^T$ be an $n \times n$-integer matrix, where $U$ is an upper triangular 0-1-matrix where all diagonal entries are equal to one. $M$ is called periodic if $M^r=id$ for some $r \geq 1$. The question is about whether there is a fast finite test to check whether a matrix is periodic, so that one just has to look for "small" $r$. See Distributive lattices with periodic Coxeter matrix for a motivation.

Question 1: Given $n$, is there a good bound for the minimal number $a(n)$ such that if $M^r \neq id$ for all $r=1,...,a(n)$, then $M$ is not periodic?

Question 2: Given $n$, is there a good bound for the minimal number $b(n)$ such that if $M$ has an entry of absolute value at least $b(n)$, then $M$ is not periodic?

Of course one might ask those questions also for integer matrices $M$ with more general properties. (there it does not work for question 2 as Gerry Myerson showed)

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Given $n$, there are only finitely many $n\times n$ 0-1 matrices $U$, hence only finitely many candidate matrices $M$. A fortiori, the minimal numbers $a(n)$ and $b(n)$ exist. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 10, 2020 at 12:28
  • $\begingroup$ @GerryMyerson Thanks. Right, I first formulated my questions for general integer matrices $M$ but then specified it. I changed the question. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 10, 2020 at 12:36

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

For general integer matrices $M$, there is no $b(n)$. E.g., for $n=2$, if $a(a+1)+1=bc$, and $$M=\pmatrix{a&-b\cr c&-a-1\cr}$$ then $M^3$ is the identity matrix.

EDIT: for general matrices, Theorem 2.7 of James Kuzmanovich and Andrey Pavlichenkov, Finite groups of matrices whose entries are integers, The American Mathematical Monthly Vol. 109, No. 2 (Feb., 2002), pp. 173-186 shows there's a bound on $a(n)$ in terms of $n$. Let $m=p_1^{e_1}p_2^{e_2}\cdots p_t^{e_t}$ with $p_1<p_2<\cdots<p_t$. Then there is an $n\times n$ integer matrix with order $m$ if and only if

  1. $\sum_{i=1}^t(p_i-1)p_i^{e_i-1}-1\le n$ for $p_1^{e_1}=2$, or

  2. $\sum_{i=1}^t(p_i-1)p_i^{e_i-1}\le n$ otherwise.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.