10
$\begingroup$

It is well known that for $K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{D})$, $D < 0$, the non-maximal order of squarefree conductor $f$, relatively prime to $D$, has class number $$h_K \prod_{p|f} (p-(\frac{D}{p}))$$

What is the class number of a non-maximal order in an imaginary quadratic extension of $\mathbb{F}_p[t]$? Is it proven using ideas involving zeta function, as appears in many books for the case above?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ EGA IV$_4$, 2nd line of (21.8.5.1). $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 15, 2010 at 19:03
  • $\begingroup$ So practically the same thing... Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 15, 2010 at 20:18
  • $\begingroup$ I was actually looking for a proof of the original fact you quoted, and Googling led me here... would you please provide a reference? Thank you! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 4:48
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ p.s. Please, I beg you, not EGA. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 4:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Harvey Cohn's Advanced Number Theory, chapter 13, section 2, theorem 2 (Dover edition, pp. 217). $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 7:49

1 Answer 1

19
$\begingroup$

There is a formula that works in all degrees, not just imaginary quadratic. In a global field $K$, let $O$ be integral over ${\mathbf Z}$ or ${\mathbf F}[t]$ (${\mathbf F}$ a finite field) and be "big", i.e., it has fraction field $K$. Let $\mathfrak c$ be the conductor ideal of $O$ in its integral closure $R$. Then $$h(O) = \frac{h(R)}{[R^\times:O^\times]}\frac{\varphi_{R}({\mathfrak c})}{\varphi_O(\mathfrak c)},$$ where $\varphi_O(\mathfrak c)$ is the number of units in $O/\mathfrak c$ and $\varphi_R(\mathfrak c)$ is the number of units in $R/\mathfrak c$. This is derived in Neukirch's alg. number theory book in the number field case, but it goes through to any one-dimensional Noetherian domain with a finite residue rings and a finite class group. In the imag. quadratic case the unit index $[R^\times:O^\times]$ is 1 most of the time so you don't notice it.

Both $\varphi_R(\mathfrak c)$ and $\varphi_O(\mathfrak c)$ can be written in the form ${\text N}(\mathfrak c)\prod_{\mathfrak p \supset \mathfrak c}(1 - 1/{\text{N}(\mathfrak p)})$, where the ideal norm $\text N$ means the index in $R$ or $O$ and $\mathfrak p$ runs over primes in $R$ or $O$ for the two cases.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.