2
$\begingroup$

Fix $a>0$ and $b>0$. Does the following ODE \begin{equation} G(x)^2+2axG(x)G'(x)+2aG'(x)(x-b)=0 \tag{*} \end{equation} have a solution, say, $F(x)$, that satisfies $F(x)>0$ and $F'(x)<0$ on $(b,\infty)$?

I tried to solve it by Mathematica, and it gives $G$ as solution to \begin{equation} x=e^{-2a\left(\text{log}\,G(x)-\frac{1}{G(x)}\right)}\left(C_0+b(2a)^{2a}\text{Gamma}\left(1-2a,\frac{2a}{G(x)}\right)\right) \tag{**} \end{equation}

for some free parameter $C_0$, where Gamma$(\cdot,\cdot)$ is the upper incomplete gamma function. However I'm not sure if this is a proper inverse function or if $G$ given by this equation has domain $(b,\infty)$.

Thanks!!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The answer is yes: indeed, for any $a>0$ and $b>0$, your equation $(**)$ with any $C_0>0$ determines
a solution $G$ to your ODE $(*)$ such that $G>0$ and $G'<0$ on $(b,\infty)$ -- and even on $(0,\infty)$.

Indeed, rewrite $(**)$ as \begin{equation} x=X(G(x)),\quad X(g):= e^{-2a\left(\text{log}\,g-\frac{1}{g}\right)}\left(C_0+b(2a)^{2a}\text{Gamma}\left(1-2a,\frac{2a}{g}\right)\right). \end{equation} Take any $C_0>0$. Then $X(0+)=\infty$ and $X(\infty-)=0$. Let \begin{equation} x_1(g):=X'(g)\,\frac{g^2 e^{2 a \left(\log g-\frac{1}{g}\right)}}{g+1}. \end{equation} Then \begin{equation} x'_1(g)=-\frac{2 a b e^{-\frac{2 a}{g}} g^{2 a}}{(g+1)^2}, \end{equation} which is manifestly negative for positive $a,b,g$, so that $X'<0$ on the interval $(0,\infty)$ and
hence the function $X\colon(0,\infty)\to(0,\infty)$ continuously decreases from $\infty$ to $0$ on $(0,\infty)$. So, the inverse function $G:=X^{-1}$ exists and solves the equation $x=X(G(x))$ for $x>0$. Moreover, $G>0$ and $G'=1/(X'\circ G)<0$, as desired.

It remains to verify that this function $G$ is a solution to your ODE $(*)$. To do this, just replace, in $(*)$, $G(x)$ by $g$ and $G'(x)$ by $1/X'(g)$, and then $x$ by $X(g)$, so that $(*)$ is rewritten as $g^2 + 2 a X(g) \frac g{X'(g)} + 2 \frac a{X'(g)}\, (X(g) - b)=0$, which is straightforward to check.

Details of calculations can be seen in the Mathematica notebook and/or its pdf image.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your reply! I'll spend some time to read it. Is it possible, though, to have $F>1$ (I just edited it) instead of $F>0$ in the old post ? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 11, 2018 at 3:45
  • $\begingroup$ Actually please ignore my last comment. $F>0$ is what I wanted. I got confused. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 11, 2018 at 3:58
  • $\begingroup$ All right. Actually, if you follow the lines of the proof, you will see that it is impossible to get $F>1$ in any neighborhood of $\infty$. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 11, 2018 at 4:02
  • $\begingroup$ How did you get Out[99] in the pdf image? I get "Limit[X[g], g -> [Infinity], Assumptions -> True]" when I run the command. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 11, 2018 at 4:21
  • $\begingroup$ Also I get a much more complicated expression for $x_1'$. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 11, 2018 at 4:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.