2
$\begingroup$

I posted this question on MSE a few time ago, but it did not receive much attention. I thought there might be an elementary answer so didn't want to post it directly on MO. My apologies if this question is not a good fit here.

Let $f:\bar{\mathbb C}\to \bar{\mathbb C}$ be a rational function, and take a circle $C$ not crossing the zero- and polar-locus of $f$. The argument principle tells us the total variation $\Delta$ of $\arg f$ along $C$, obtained by performing the analytic continuation of $g : t\in[0,1]\mapsto \arg f(z(t))$ for some parameterization $z(\bullet)$ of $C$:$$ \Delta = g(1)-g(0)=2\pi(Z-P)$$ where $Z$ is the count of roots of $f$ encircled by $C$ and $P$ that of its poles (of course this value can also be obtained by integrating $\frac{f'}{if}$ along $C$).

What it does not tell is the size of $g([0,1])$. Question: how big can this interval get? Is there a known bound, e.g. in terms of the degree of $f$ and/or the zeroes and poles encircled by $C$?

Also, although the answer might not depend on the special shape of $C$, I don't want to assume $C$ to be «small enough» or to match too restrictive hypothesis of the like.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ very nice question. I think the answer depend on the shape of $C$.For example put $f(z)=z$. Now let $C:[0,1]\to \mathbb{C}$ is a simple closed curve surrounding the origin which image of its restriction to $[0,1/2]$ is identical to the image of the spiral curve $\lambda(s)=e^{-s+is}$, for $s$ sufficiently large. for such curve the image of $g$ is large. So is it a good Idea that we expect to bound the length of $g$ in term of length of $C$? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 11, 2014 at 9:03
  • $\begingroup$ @AliTaghavi I'm not so sure it is such a great question actually. I was aware that if $C$ is spiralling enough then you can get large variations (that's why the question is asked for circles). But you're surely right that there should exists a bound in terms of the length (or more likely «curvature deviation») of $C$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 11, 2014 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ I think the question is interesting because it assigne a new quantity to a simple closed curve and a vec. field along it.the quantity is the length of interval image of $g$. As a possible another quantity could be "the total variation" of $g$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 11, 2014 at 10:02

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

There are some easy bounds. Let $f(z) = \dfrac{g_1(z) g_2(z)}{h_1(z) h_2(z)}$ where $g_1, g_2, h_1, h_2$ are polynomials not identically $0$, $g_1$ and $h_1$ having their roots inside the circle $C$ and $g_2$ and $h_2$ having their roots outside. Then the length of $g([0,1])$ is at most $2 \pi (\deg(g_1) + \deg(h_1)) + \pi (\deg(g_2) + \deg(h_2))$. This is best possible in the case where only one of $g_1, g_2, h_1, h_2$ is non-constant.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.