4
$\begingroup$

A statistical model is a function $P : \Theta \to \Delta(X)$, where $\Theta$ is a parameter space, and $\Delta(X)$ is the set of probability measures on a state space $X$.

Suppose that $\Theta$ and $X$ are topological spaces, and equip $\Delta(X)$ with the topology of weak convergence of measures. Suppose that the function $P : \Theta \to \Delta(X)$ is continuous, defining a topological statistical model.

An $X$-valued random variable is a measurable function $x : \Omega \to X$ on some abstract probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal F, \mathbb P)$. The push-forward measure $x_* \mathbb P := \mathbb P \circ x^{-1}$ is called the law or marginal of $x$.

If $P : \Theta \to \Delta(X)$ defines a statistical model, can we find an abstract probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal F, \mathbb P)$ and a family of $X$-valued random variables $\{x_\theta\}$ so that $(x_\theta)_* \mathbb P = P_\theta$ for each $\theta \in \Theta$?

Moreover, if $P$ defines a topological statistical model, what regularity properties does this imply about the higher-order function $\theta \mapsto x_\theta$? If so, can the space $L = L(\Omega,X)$ of $X$-valued random variables be equipped with a natural topology so that the function $x : \Theta \to L$ is continuous?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For the nontopological case, you can simply take $\Omega=X^\Theta$, $\mathcal{F}$ the product $\sigma$-algebry, $\mathbb{P}=\otimes_{\theta\in\Theta}P_\theta$ and $x_\theta$ the projection onto the $\theta$'s factor. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16, 2013 at 8:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm kind of lost: as Michael Greinecker recalled, you can always build a huge probability space in which all your variables live, whatever $\Theta$ is, thanks to the tensor product construction. Then, maybe the "natural" topology you look for just the convergence in distribution of random variables ? In this case, that $x:\Theta\rightarrow L$ is continuous is by definition equivalent to $P:\Theta\rightarrow \Delta(X)$ continuous. But maybe I misunderstood the question. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16, 2013 at 9:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The tricky part is regularity, then. This is the whole point of Kolmogorov's continuity theorem: the product construction does not guarantee regularity. I have to think about @John Dawkins' answer a little more. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16, 2013 at 14:38

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

D. Blackwell and L. Dubins [An extension of Skorohod's almost sure representation theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 89} (1983) 691–692] have shown that is $X$ is a reasonable space then there is a map $P\to f_P$ of $\Delta(X)$ into $L$ (based on a well-chosen probability space $(\Omega,{\mathcal F}, {\mathbb P})$) such that, for each $P\in\Delta(X)$, (i) the push forward of ${\mathbb P}$ by $f_P$ is $P$ and (ii) $Q\mapsto f_Q(\omega)$ is continuous at $P$, for a.e. $\omega\in\Omega$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.