Skip to content

Conversation

@snitin315
Copy link
Member

@snitin315 snitin315 commented Dec 4, 2022

  • This is a bugfix
  • This is a feature
  • This is a code refactor
  • This is a test update
  • This is a docs update
  • This is a metadata update

For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?

No

Motivation / Use-Case

Sometimes tests are flaky and the job keeps running for hours.

Screenshot 2022-12-04 at 8 35 42 AM

Screenshot 2022-12-04 at 8 36 59 AM

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 92.11% // Head: 92.11% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (98f1607) compared to base (d1309d2).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #4666 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 92.11% 92.11% ======================================= Files 16 16 Lines 1661 1661 Branches 623 623 ======================================= Hits 1530 1530 Misses 120 120 Partials 11 11 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Member

@alexander-akait alexander-akait left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the problem is in workaround for IPv6 and macos (we already fix it for node 16+), can you check it?

@alexander-akait
Copy link
Member

Let's close, I don't think it really help, we need debug tests if it will fail again, I will do it

@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the snitin315-patch-1 branch September 11, 2025 11:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants