Skip to content

Conversation

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres commented Nov 12, 2019

Closes #800

This change (choose one):

  • Breaks existing normative behavior (please add label "breaking")
  • Adds new normative requirements
  • Adds new normative recommendations or optional items
  • Makes only editorial changes (only changes informative sections, or
    changes normative sections without changing behavior)
  • Is a "chore" (metadata, formatting, fixing warnings, etc).

Implementation commitment (delete if not making normative changes):

  • Safari (link to issue)
  • Chrome (link to issue)
  • Firefox (link to issue)
  • Edge (public signal)

Commit message:

Removing, as no one implemented the serviceworker member.


Preview | Diff

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres requested a review from mgiuca November 12, 2019 09:03
Copy link
Collaborator

@mgiuca mgiuca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Pour one out for serviceworker.

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres merged commit 8923ba4 into gh-pages Nov 15, 2019
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres deleted the remove_serviceworker branch November 15, 2019 07:09
sideshowbarker added a commit to w3c/browser-compat-data that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2020
w3c/manifest#825 removed the serviceworker member from the set of possible Web App Manifest members. w3c/manifest@8923ba4
queengooborg pushed a commit to mdn/browser-compat-data that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2020
w3c/manifest#825 removed the serviceworker member from the set of possible Web App Manifest members. w3c/manifest@8923ba4
christianliebel pushed a commit to christianliebel/manifest that referenced this pull request May 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants