Skip to content

Conversation

@zrh122
Copy link
Contributor

@zrh122 zrh122 commented Jul 4, 2019

fixes #10224.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:

slot fallback content should be evaluated only when the parent is not providing it.
Copy link
Member

@posva posva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deleted because I wanted to approve

Copy link
Member

@posva posva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
I haven't checked if this has a bad impact on performance in specific scenarios

@sagalbot
Copy link

Is there a release date for this fix? Or any additional work that needs to be done?

sagalbot added a commit to sagalbot/vue-select that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2019
}
props = extend(extend({}, bindObject), props)
}
nodes = scopedSlotFn(props) || fallback
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to account for already render vnodes here (from component compiled with an older version of Vue)

@posva
Copy link
Member

posva commented Apr 16, 2021

I added the commit for retro compatibility at #12014 because I couldn't push to the branch

@posva posva closed this Apr 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

5 participants