Skip to content

Conversation

@micah-wil
Copy link
Contributor

@micah-wil micah-wil commented Dec 10, 2025

v1/e2e/test_spec_decode.py::test_suffix_decoding_acceptance has been a bit flaky, failing about 5.6% of the time for almost the same exact reason each time despite passing after a retry. The final acceptance threshold is currently last_accept_rate > 0.825. Here are some examples of recent failures in buildkite for this test:

Build 42551:
FAILED v1/e2e/test_spec_decode.py::test_suffix_decoding_acceptance - assert 0.8142514011208967 > 0.825

Build 42535
FAILED v1/e2e/test_spec_decode.py::test_suffix_decoding_acceptance - assert 0.8142514011208967 > 0.825

Build 42714:
FAILED v1/e2e/test_spec_decode.py::test_suffix_decoding_acceptance - assert 0.8105515587529976 > 0.825

I believe I looked through almost all of the failures from the past week and all of them were 0.81 or above. I think if we can just set the threshold to 0.80, the success rate over the past week would have been 100%

Signed-off-by: Micah Williamson <micah.williamson@amd.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.

@mergify mergify bot added the v1 label Dec 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to reduce flakiness in test_suffix_decoding_acceptance by lowering the acceptance rate threshold. The change is justified and seems correct. I have one high-severity comment regarding a stale comment and a magic number that should be addressed to improve maintainability.

Signed-off-by: Micah Williamson <micah.williamson@amd.com>
@njhill njhill added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Dec 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@njhill njhill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @micah-wil

@njhill njhill enabled auto-merge (squash) December 10, 2025 01:10
@njhill njhill merged commit 7d80c73 into vllm-project:main Dec 10, 2025
21 checks passed
shaharmor98 pushed a commit to shaharmor98/smor-vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
…cceptance (vllm-project#30367) Signed-off-by: Micah Williamson <micah.williamson@amd.com>
TheCodeWrangler pushed a commit to TheCodeWrangler/vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
…cceptance (vllm-project#30367) Signed-off-by: Micah Williamson <micah.williamson@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Price <nathan@abridge.com>
TheCodeWrangler pushed a commit to TheCodeWrangler/vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
…cceptance (vllm-project#30367) Signed-off-by: Micah Williamson <micah.williamson@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Price <nathan@abridge.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Price <nathan@abridge.com>
TheCodeWrangler pushed a commit to TheCodeWrangler/vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
…cceptance (vllm-project#30367) Signed-off-by: Micah Williamson <micah.williamson@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Price <nathan@abridge.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed v1

2 participants