Added tags and random test execution parameters

[viniciusam]

Fixes #50 #42

[jgebal]

@pesse - any chance for you to review this PR?

[jgebal]

I think this is why we have no coverage on project anymore.
Any reason why jacoco was removed?

[viniciusam]

It wasn't removed, it was added in the pom as a build step:
https://github.com/utPLSQL/utPLSQL-maven-plugin/blob/release/3.1.3/pom.xml#L252
https://github.com/utPLSQL/utPLSQL-maven-plugin/blob/release/3.1.3/pom.xml#L400

I remember testing this, I will need to take another look.

[jgebal]

@viniciusam - something odd with sonar reporting - no coverage was reported on this PR.
If you look at develop - there was coverage on UtPLSQLMojo.java
https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=org.utplsql%3Autplsql-maven-plugin&metric=coverage&selected=org.utplsql%3Autplsql-maven-plugin%3Asrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Futplsql%2Fmaven%2Fplugin%2FUtPLSQLMojo.java&view=list

[jgebal]

It seems that coverage is not getting gathered on pull requests or something...

[sonarqubecloud]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities (and 0 Security Hotspots to review)
0 Code Smells

0.0% Coverage
0.0% Duplication

[jgebal]

I ran the MVN in debug mode.
Jacoco sonar import cannot find any Jacoco reports for some reason.

[INFO] 00:17:16.784 Sensor HTML [web] (done) | time=6ms [INFO] 00:17:16.784 Sensor JaCoCo XML Report Importer [jacoco] [DEBUG] 00:17:16.788 No reports found [INFO] 00:17:16.788 Sensor JaCoCo XML Report Importer [jacoco] (done) | time=4ms [INFO] 00:17:16.788 Sensor ThymeLeaf template sensor [securityjavafrontend] [INFO] 00:17:16.789 Sensor ThymeLeaf template sensor [securityjavafrontend] (don 

Full raw build log here:
https://api.travis-ci.org/v3/job/672308796/log.txt
or here:
https://travis-ci.org/github/utPLSQL/utPLSQL-maven-plugin/builds/672308795

[jgebal]

There is a lot of valuable code here.
I don't want lack of coverage report to be a blocker for merging this.
@pesse - We can merge this if you're OK.
Jacoco reporting on the project can be solved post-release - what do you think?

[pesse]

Yes, sure. I will try to get it running in a test setup, but current times are not that side-hobby friendly 😉

[viniciusam]

Thanks, I'm gonna merge it then. I have a branch with some code refactoring, so I might get the coverage up on that.