Skip to content

Conversation

weaverryan
Copy link
Member

Q A
Doc fix? no
New docs? no
Applies to all
Fixed tickets n/a

Hi guys!

After merging this nice new entry in #4141, I wanted to make a few minor language tweaks (the diff looks bigger than the changes really are). This included shortening a few sections and talking less about how all reverse proxies refuse to cache pages with a session, because I don't (for example) believe this is true with Symfony's reverse proxy.

Thanks!

@weaverryan weaverryan changed the title [#4141] Tweaks to the new form csrf caching entry Tweaks to the new form csrf caching entry Jan 4, 2015
@dbu
Copy link
Contributor

dbu commented Jan 5, 2015

seems good to me, easier to read and no mistakes introduced as far as i can see.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there are some missing words here:

When a user submits, the token ... 

Proposal:

When a user submits the form, the token ... 
@weaverryan weaverryan merged commit cc40b5c into 2.3 Jan 16, 2015
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2015
This PR was merged into the 2.3 branch. Discussion ---------- Tweaks to the new form csrf caching entry | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Doc fix? | no | New docs? | no | Applies to | all | Fixed tickets | n/a Hi guys! After merging this nice new entry in #4141, I wanted to make a few minor language tweaks (the diff looks bigger than the changes really are). This included shortening a few sections and talking less about how *all* reverse proxies refuse to cache pages with a session, because I don't (for example) believe this is true with Symfony's reverse proxy. Thanks! Commits ------- cc40b5c Adding missing words thanks to javiereguiluz 1c568e1 [#4141] Tweaks to the new form csrf caching entry
@xabbuh xabbuh deleted the csrf-form-tweaks branch January 16, 2015 17:58
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it be "is" instead of "are"? And should we add a label for the old headline?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right! Fixed at sha: 36d1bac

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

4 participants