Skip to content

Conversation

epochblue
Copy link
Contributor

For consistency sake, instances of "he", "she", "his", "hers",
"his/hers", "he/she", etc were replaced with "they", "their", etc (or
were removed all together in cases where they weren't necessary). Verb
tenses should also have been corrected where changes were made.

For consistency sake, instances of "he", "she", "his", "hers", "his/hers", "he/she", etc were replaced with "they", "their", etc (or were removed all together in cases where they weren't necessary). Verb tenses should also have been corrected where changes were made.
@richardmiller-zz
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@DBNess
Copy link

DBNess commented Dec 1, 2013

👏

@weaverryan
Copy link
Member

Hey Mr Bill!

I like it! This issue is important to me - I don't like saying "he" (for obvious reasons), and saying he/she makes the sentence read unnaturally (even if it is correct). I'd be very happy to use the less-correct plural tense and be done with it :).

So, I've patched this into the 2.2 branch at sha: 66ee944 - we'll merge it up into the other branches from there.

Thanks for this!

@weaverryan weaverryan closed this Dec 1, 2013
@Pictor13
Copy link

Pictor13 commented Feb 9, 2020

In some feminist groups there's also the common use of "*he" or "s/he".
I usually tend to the first one, but it's problematic with possessive forms.
I've always thought that with feminist movements, English will end up using "it"/"its" to refer generically to someone.
"They" sounds strange to me, but I am not a native English speaker, and I am aware that it is often used in order to refer to a generic individual.

Just my two cents (on a prehistoric issue 😅).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

5 participants