Skip to content

Conversation

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member Author

Ping @weaverryan if you can, please review this. I'm not sure my wording is perfectly clear here. Thanks a lot!

@OskarStark
Copy link
Contributor

I think you miss the latest change about „failover()“ and „roundrobin()“ here, which was merged in another PR yesterday? Today?

I am currently on a phone 📱

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member Author

@OskarStark you are right ... but that change was made in 4.4 (as a BC break, but that's OK because it's still experimental). This one improves the explanation from 4.3, which is when this was introduced.

@OskarStark
Copy link
Contributor

You are right 👍🏻

javiereguiluz added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2019
…ereguiluz) This PR was squashed before being merged into the 4.3 branch (closes #12301). Discussion ---------- [Mailer] Better explain the load-balancing options Commits ------- bc668cc [Mailer] Better explain the load-balancing options
@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz merged commit bc668cc into symfony:4.3 Sep 16, 2019
@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz deleted the mailer_load_balancing branch September 16, 2019 07:12
Copy link
Member

@fabpot fabpot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's wrong: failover is not about load-balancing as it keeps using the same transport until it breaks. Only round-robin is about load-balancing.

javiereguiluz added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2019
…guiluz) This PR was merged into the 4.3 branch. Discussion ---------- Fixed some explanations in the mailer component This fixes some mistakes introduced in #12301 because "failover" is not a "load balancing" technique but a "high availability" one. Commits ------- 27e46a7 Fixed some explanations in the mailer component
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment