Skip to content

Conversation

@ottaviano
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! I think we should do this.

I'm not entirely sure about adding the comment about underscored HTTP headers. @xabbuh do you think we should add it ... or better remove it to lower our readers' cognitive load? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@kunicmarko20 kunicmarko20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the comment is not needed, it could confuse people.

@ottaviano
Copy link
Contributor Author

agree, will remove it

@ottaviano ottaviano force-pushed the fix-http-header-key branch from d49a33f to cea94f4 Compare November 9, 2018 14:49
@xabbuh xabbuh added this to the 2.8 milestone Nov 10, 2018
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Nov 10, 2018

Thank you @ottaviano.

xabbuh added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2018
This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was merged into the 2.8 branch instead (closes #10651). Discussion ---------- Rename content_type header to content-type Commits ------- 9feaac0 Rename content_type header to content-type
@xabbuh xabbuh closed this Nov 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

5 participants