Skip to content

Conversation

@NickLarsenNZ
Copy link
Member

Part of stackabletech/issues#677

Note

I did consider leaving one excluding in, and commenting it so that we have a template for future exclusions. Let me know if you prefer that.

Copy link
Member

@razvan razvan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ added this pull request to the merge queue May 2, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit de7cdc8 May 2, 2025
2 checks passed
@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ deleted the remove-cargo-deny-exclusions branch May 2, 2025 14:31
sbernauer added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
Part of stackabletech/issues#677 Fixup of #513 operator-rs is using the rsa crate, there is no fix yet
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
* fix: Re-add RUSTSEC-2023-0071 exclusion Part of stackabletech/issues#677 Fixup of #513 operator-rs is using the rsa crate, there is no fix yet * typo * Update template/deny.toml Co-authored-by: Nick <10092581+NickLarsenNZ@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Nick <10092581+NickLarsenNZ@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants