Skip to content

Conversation

@thomasdarimont
Copy link

Previously we didn't support referring to aliased fields defined in former stages of an aggregation pipeline. We now also consider field aliases during field reference lookup.

Thomas Darimont added 2 commits May 2, 2014 09:28
… pipeline operator. Prepare issue branch.
Previously we didn't support referring to aliased fields defined in former stages of an aggregation pipeline. We now also consider field aliases during field reference lookup. Original pull request: #176.
thomasdarimont pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2014
Previously we didn't support referring to aliased fields defined in former stages of an aggregation pipeline. We now also consider field aliases during field reference lookup. Original pull request: #176.
thomasdarimont pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2014
Previously we didn't support referring to aliased fields defined in former stages of an aggregation pipeline. We now also consider field aliases during field reference lookup. Original pull request: #176.
@odrotbohm odrotbohm closed this May 2, 2014
@odrotbohm odrotbohm deleted the issue/DATAMONGO-924 branch May 2, 2014 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants