- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
[MRG] Tests refactoring #242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #242 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 98.95% 98.27% -0.68% ========================================== Files 50 58 +8 Lines 4007 3429 -578 ========================================== - Hits 3965 3370 -595 - Misses 42 59 +17
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
| @chkoar You were right the refactoring was worth when checking at the number of lines suppressed. It is good for merging |
| You can check codecov but I don't think that the difference of coverage is a problem. This is difficult to cover the tools used for testing ;) |
| @chkoar I think that this is good for merging this time |
| Thanks |
Remove useless docstring in tests Add utils and common test to check estimator Add test for meta-classifiers Factorize tests Add SkipTest from scikit-learn Add missing tests Remove useless tests
Remove useless docstring in tests Add utils and common test to check estimator Add test for meta-classifiers Factorize tests Add SkipTest from scikit-learn Add missing tests Remove useless tests
Remove useless docstring in tests Add utils and common test to check estimator Add test for meta-classifiers Factorize tests Add SkipTest from scikit-learn Add missing tests Remove useless tests
Reference Issue
Fixes #238
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
TODO:
test_common.pyfor the different samplers:check_estimator;BinarySamplerorMulticlassSampler;ratio;check_fitting-> we need to bringcheck_is_fitfrom sklearn;Any other comments?